Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1958–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mentzer v. Burlingame
neutral
2 sentences1965In Mentzer v. Burlingame, 85 Kan. 641, 643 , 118 Pac. 698 , we said: “ ‘The declarations of a deceased person made against his pecuniary or proprietary interest concerning facts within his knowledge which are material and relevant to the issue, are admissible in evidence ... (1 Ell. 1965In Mentzer v. Burlingame, 85 Kan. 641, 643 , 118 Pac. 698 , we said: “ ‘The declarations of a deceased person made against his pecuniary or proprietary interest concerning facts within his knowledge which are material and relevant to the issue, are admissible in evidence ... (1 Ell. | 2 | 1958–1965 |
State v. Owens
green
1 sentence2022Sutton claims his trial counsel objected to the admission of the evidence as hearsay, and over his objection, the trial court ruled the audio recording was admissible under the declaration against interest exception to the hearsay rule, K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 60-460(j). "'"Evidence of a statement which is made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing, offered to prove the truth of the matter stated, is hearsay evidence and inadmissible" unless one or more statutory exceptions apply.'" State v. Owens, 314 Kan. 210 , 221, 496 P.3d 902 (2021) (quoting K.S.A. 60-460). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Cooper
green
1 sentence1999State v. Cooper, 20 Kan. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Prince
green
2 sentences1995State v. Jones, 246 Kan. 214 ; State v. Jackson, 244 Kan. 621 , 772 P.2d 747 (1989); State v. Haislip, 237 Kan. 461 , 701 P.2d 909 , cert. denied 474 U.S. 1022 (1985); State v. Prince, 227 Kan. 137 , 605 P.2d 563 (1980). 1995State v. Jones, 246 Kan. 214 ; State v. Jackson, 244 Kan. 621 , 772 P.2d 747 (1989); State v. Haislip, 237 Kan. 461 , 701 P.2d 909 , cert. denied 474 U.S. 1022 (1985); State v. Prince, 227 Kan. 137 , 605 P.2d 563 (1980). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Quick
green
2 sentences1995State v. Thomas, 252 Kan. 564, 572 , 847 P.2d 1219 (1993) (citing State v. Quick, 226 Kan. 308, 317 , 597 P.2d 1108 [1979]). 1995State v. Thomas, 252 Kan. 564, 572 , 847 P.2d 1219 (1993) (citing State v. Quick, 226 Kan. 308, 317 , 597 P.2d 1108 [1979]). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1995State v. Jones, 246 Kan. 214 ; State v. Jackson, 244 Kan. 621 , 772 P.2d 747 (1989); State v. Haislip, 237 Kan. 461 , 701 P.2d 909 , cert. denied 474 U.S. 1022 (1985); State v. Prince, 227 Kan. 137 , 605 P.2d 563 (1980). 1995State v. Jones, 246 Kan. 214 ; State v. Jackson, 244 Kan. 621 , 772 P.2d 747 (1989); State v. Haislip, 237 Kan. 461 , 701 P.2d 909 , cert. denied 474 U.S. 1022 (1985); State v. Prince, 227 Kan. 137 , 605 P.2d 563 (1980). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Thomas
green
2 sentences1995State v. Thomas, 252 Kan. 564, 572 , 847 P.2d 1219 (1993) (citing State v. Quick, 226 Kan. 308, 317 , 597 P.2d 1108 [1979]). 1995State v. Thomas, 252 Kan. 564, 572 , 847 P.2d 1219 (1993) (citing State v. Quick, 226 Kan. 308, 317 , 597 P.2d 1108 [1979]). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Jones
green
1 sentence1995State v. Jones, 246 Kan. 214 ; State v. Jackson, 244 Kan. 621 , 772 P.2d 747 (1989); State v. Haislip, 237 Kan. 461 , 701 P.2d 909 , cert. denied 474 U.S. 1022 (1985); State v. Prince, 227 Kan. 137 , 605 P.2d 563 (1980). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Haislip
green
2 sentences1995State v. Jones, 246 Kan. 214 ; State v. Jackson, 244 Kan. 621 , 772 P.2d 747 (1989); State v. Haislip, 237 Kan. 461 , 701 P.2d 909 , cert. denied 474 U.S. 1022 (1985); State v. Prince, 227 Kan. 137 , 605 P.2d 563 (1980). 1995State v. Jones, 246 Kan. 214 ; State v. Jackson, 244 Kan. 621 , 772 P.2d 747 (1989); State v. Haislip, 237 Kan. 461 , 701 P.2d 909 , cert. denied 474 U.S. 1022 (1985); State v. Prince, 227 Kan. 137 , 605 P.2d 563 (1980). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Black v. United States
green
1 sentence1995State v. Jones, 246 Kan. 214 ; State v. Jackson, 244 Kan. 621 , 772 P.2d 747 (1989); State v. Haislip, 237 Kan. 461 , 701 P.2d 909 , cert. denied 474 U.S. 1022 (1985); State v. Prince, 227 Kan. 137 , 605 P.2d 563 (1980). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.