rflp analysis (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

rflp analysis in Kansas

5 Kansas opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Hillgreen
kan · 1995 · cited in 2 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1997–2013
2 sentences

2013See State v. Hill, 257 Kan. 774 , 895 P.2d 1238 (1995) (PCR analysis met Frye test).

1997Additionally, it can test samples too small and/or in too poor a condition to be tested by RFLP analysis.” (Emphasis added.) Hill, 257 Kan. at 782 .

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Smith v. Deppish green
kan · 1991
2 sentences

2013Similarly, in Smith v. Deppish, 248 Kan. 217 , 813 P.2d 929 (1991), this court held that DNA profiling results through RFLP analysis based upon probability calculations was subject to Frye .

1995The DNA evidence in the instant case obtained through PCR testing differs substantially from the RFLP analysis discussed and upheld in Smith v. Deppish, 248 Kan. 217, 230-39 , 807 P.2d 144 (1991).

31995–2013
In Re McKenna neutral
kan · 1991
1 sentence

2013Similarly, in Smith v. Deppish, 248 Kan. 217 , 813 P.2d 929 (1991), this court held that DNA profiling results through RFLP analysis based upon probability calculations was subject to Frye .

12013–2013
State v. Dykes green
kan · 1993
2 sentences

1997In Dykes, 252 Kan. 556 , we discussed the database used to determine the probability statistics used in an RFLP analysis.

1997In Dykes, 252 Kan. 556 , we discussed the database used to determine the probability statistics used in an RFLP analysis.

11997–1997
State v. Ford green
sc · 1990
1 sentence

1991State v. Ford, _ S.C. at _, 392 S.E.2d at 784 . *239 We agree with the trial court that: (1) The experts’ testimony in this case established that there is sufficient acceptance of DNA profiling; (2) Lifecodes’ techniques and procedures are accepted by the scientific community; (3) the DNA profiling evidence was admissible; and (4) Smith did not establish that the amendments to the reports affected the reliability of Lifecodes’ procedures.

11991–1991

Statutes the citing opinions construe

KS § K.S.A. § 21-3502 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 11 (1991–2026) IL 8 (1993–2010) TX 5 (1992–2024) KS 5 (1991–2013) LA 5 (1996–2002) MA 5 (1992–2001) AZ 4 (1995–1997) CO 4 (1993–2001) MS 4 (1994–2001) OR 2 (1993–2015) WA 2 (1993–2006) NY 2 (1994–2001) MD 2 (1995–2000) MT 2 (1994–1995) OK 2 (1995–1998) SC 2 (1990–1997) MN 2 (1999–2003) PA 2 (1992–1994)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check