Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2021See State v. Williams, 303 Kan. 585, 598-99 , 363 P.3d 1101 (2016). 2021See State v. Williams, 303 Kan. 585, 598-99 , 363 P.3d 1101 (2016). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dubishgreen1 sentence2001See Dubish, 234 Kan. at 715 (moderate harm is encompassed within simple batteiy). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2021State v. Johnson, 304 Kan. 924, 931 , 376 P.3d 70 (2016). 2021State v. Johnson, 304 Kan. 924, 931 , 376 P.3d 70 (2016). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Simmons
green
1 sentence2012Instead, for its legal argument, the State manufactures a rule of law, ostensibly divined from our prior decision in Simmons, 282 Kan. at 741-42 , that “[i]n order to be entitled to a lesser included instruction, three factors must coincide: (1) the requested instruction must be of a lesser degree with respect to tire crime charged; (2) the defendant’s theory of defense must not be inconsistent with a conviction based upon the requested lesser included instruction; and (3) the evidence at trial must not odierwise exclude a theory of guilt on the lesser offense.” The State then does not challen | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Moore
green
1 sentence2003Stating that the victim’s injuries were not trivial, minor, or in the nature of bruising, the Moore court framed the question before it as “whether a reasonable jury could have found that the injuries constituted ‘moderate’ harm, which would necessitate a giving of a simple battery instruction. [Citation omitted.]” 271 Kan. at 420 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Manzanares
neutral
1 sentence1997The trial court refused to give this instruction, relying upon State v. Manzanares, 19 Kan. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.