Tenth Circuit rule (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

Tenth Circuit rule in Kansas

5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. Poegreen
ca10 · 2009 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015See Poe, 556 F.3d at 1122 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
In re Long neutral
kan · 1994
1 sentence

2022In re Long, 255 Kan. at 794-95 .

12022–2022
Harris v. Ron Champion green
ca10 · 1994
1 sentence

2008The Tenth Circuit’s analysis also expanded the prejudice element to include whether delay (i) caused the defendant to suffer oppressive incarceration pending appeal; (ii) caused the defendant to suffer constitutionally cognizable anxiety and concern awaiting the outcome of his or her appeal; or (in) impaired the defendant’s grounds for appeal or his or her defenses in the event of a reversal and retrial. 15 F. 3d at 1559 .

12008–2008
Massaro v. United States green
scotus · 2003
2 sentences

2007Rice’s argument that Kansas should adopt the Tenth Circuit rule is founded upon the Galloway decision and its citation to Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500 , 155 L.

2007Rice’s argument that Kansas should adopt the Tenth Circuit rule is founded upon the Galloway decision and its citation to Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500 , 155 L.

12007–2007
Milk 'N' More, Inc., a Corporation v. Jack D. Beavert green
ca10 · 1992
1 sentence

1994Any ambiguity should be construed against the drafter, which in that case was Milk N' More. 963 F.2d at 1346 .

11994–1994

Where else courts name it

CO 7 (1991–2025) KS 5 (1994–2022) WY 5 (2001–2021) NM 4 (1999–2001) IL 3 (1975–2011) IA 3 (1999–2010) TX 3 (2004–2015) UT 3 (2002–2025) OK 2 (2003–2011) WA 2 (2001–2016) NY 2 (2006–2016) MS 2 (2005–2006) AL 2 (1998–1998) OR 2 (2014–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check