Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2020–2023 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Edgar
green
2 sentences2023Citing K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 22- 3210(d)(1) and the three nonexclusive factors set forth in State v. Edgar, 281 Kan. 30, 36 , 127 P.3d 986 (2006), the court held Bilbrey failed to show good cause to withdraw his pleas. 2023Citing K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 22- 3210(d)(1) and the three nonexclusive factors set forth in State v. Edgar, 281 Kan. 30, 36 , 127 P.3d 986 (2006), the court held Bilbrey failed to show good cause to withdraw his pleas. | 5 | 2020–2023 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2020The court stated, "The Edgar factors are, one, whether the defendant was represented by competent counsel, [two] whether the defendant was misled, coerced, mistreated or unfairly taken advantage of and, three, whether the plea was fairly and understandingly made." As to the first Edgar issue, which is the one relevant for this appeal, the court stated: "[To address the first factor,] I considered the two-prong test in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , [ 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. 2020The court stated, "The Edgar factors are, one, whether the defendant was represented by competent counsel, [two] whether the defendant was misled, coerced, mistreated or unfairly taken advantage of and, three, whether the plea was fairly and understandingly made." As to the first Edgar issue, which is the one relevant for this appeal, the court stated: "[To address the first factor,] I considered the two-prong test in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , [ 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.