Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Cartergreen2 sentences2026Comm’n v. Carter, 689 S.W.2d 360, 361 (Ky. 1985) (“[W]e find no authority before the court to authorize the doctrine of substantial compliance in a case where the appeal process is statutorily created and implemented.”). 2025Comm’n v. Carter, 689 S.W.2d 360, 361 (Ky. 1985) (holding that “we find no authority before the court to authorize the doctrine of substantial compliance in a case where the appeal process is statutorily created and implemented.”). | 2 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
BOARD OF ADJUST. OF CITY OF RICHMOND v. Flood
green
2 sentences2012The Court of Appeals held that the petition should not be dismissed because it was in substantial compliance with the provisions of KRS 341.450(1); however, upon review, citing to Board of Adjustments of City of Richmond v. Flood, 581 S.W.2d 1 (Ky.1978), this Court stated “we find no authority before the court to authorize the doctrine of substantial compliance in a ease where the appeal process is statutorily created and implemented.” Id. at 361. 2012In Flood , plaintiffs seeking judicial review under KRS 100.347 of a board of adjustments decision failed to comply with the statutory requirement of naming the planning commission as a party defendant. 581 S.W.2d at 2 . | 3 | 1985–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.