5 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Metzinger v. Kentucky Retirement Systemsgreen2 sentences2026Metzinger v. Kentucky Retirement Systems, 299 S.W.3d 541, 545 (Ky. 2009) (citation omitted). 2026Metzinger v. Kentucky Retirement Systems, 299 S.W.3d 541, 545 (Ky. 2009) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. O'DEAgreen2 sentences2025They invoke the circuit court’s authority to act as a court of review.” Smith v. O’Dea, 939 S.W.2d 353, 355 (Ky. App. 1997). -8- deference.”8 As Justice Thompson recently noted, “while the United States Supreme Court experimented with deferring to administrative agencies with the adoption of the Chevron doctrine in 1984, . . . it has unequivocally rejected this practice as being inappropriate with the requirement that Courts are tasked to determine the law.” Hall v. BPM Lumber, LLC, 706 S.W.3d 191 , 206 (Ky. 2024) (Thompson, J., dissenting) (citing Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 36 2025They invoke the circuit court’s authority to act as a court of review.” Smith v. O’Dea, 939 S.W.2d 353, 355 (Ky. App. 1997). -8- deference.”8 As Justice Thompson recently noted, “while the United States Supreme Court experimented with deferring to administrative agencies with the adoption of the Chevron doctrine in 1984, . . . it has unequivocally rejected this practice as being inappropriate with the requirement that Courts are tasked to determine the law.” Hall v. BPM Lumber, LLC, 706 S.W.3d 191 , 206 (Ky. 2024) (Thompson, J., dissenting) (citing Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 36 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
red
2 sentences2026Such deference, often referred to as the Chevron doctrine, derived from the United States Supreme Court decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). 2026Such deference, often referred to as the Chevron doctrine, derived from the United States Supreme Court decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
green
2 sentences2025They invoke the circuit court’s authority to act as a court of review.” Smith v. O’Dea, 939 S.W.2d 353, 355 (Ky. App. 1997). -8- deference.”8 As Justice Thompson recently noted, “while the United States Supreme Court experimented with deferring to administrative agencies with the adoption of the Chevron doctrine in 1984, . . . it has unequivocally rejected this practice as being inappropriate with the requirement that Courts are tasked to determine the law.” Hall v. BPM Lumber, LLC, 706 S.W.3d 191 , 206 (Ky. 2024) (Thompson, J., dissenting) (citing Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 36 2025They invoke the circuit court’s authority to act as a court of review.” Smith v. O’Dea, 939 S.W.2d 353, 355 (Ky. App. 1997). -8- deference.”8 As Justice Thompson recently noted, “while the United States Supreme Court experimented with deferring to administrative agencies with the adoption of the Chevron doctrine in 1984, . . . it has unequivocally rejected this practice as being inappropriate with the requirement that Courts are tasked to determine the law.” Hall v. BPM Lumber, LLC, 706 S.W.3d 191 , 206 (Ky. 2024) (Thompson, J., dissenting) (citing Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 36 | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Miller v. Harris
green
2 sentences2018"An abuse of discretion occurs when a trial court enters a decision that is arbitrary, unreasonable, unfair, or unsupported by sound legal principles." Miller v. Harris , 320 S.W.3d 138 , 141 (Ky. App. 2010) (citations omitted). 2018"An abuse of discretion occurs when a trial court enters a decision that is arbitrary, unreasonable, unfair, or unsupported by sound legal principles." Miller v. Harris , 320 S.W.3d 138 , 141 (Ky. App. 2010) (citations omitted). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Yount v. Calvert
neutral
2 sentences2018Under Yount v. Calvert , 826 S.W.2d 833 , 837 (Ky. App. 1991), we review the application of the Chevron factors for an abuse of discretion. 2018Under Yount v. Calvert , 826 S.W.2d 833 , 837 (Ky. App. 1991), we review the application of the Chevron factors for an abuse of discretion. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
United States v. Mead Corp.
green
2 sentences2016United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 226-27 , 121 S.Ct. 2164 , 150 L.Ed.2d 292 (2001) (clarifying that Chevron deference applies where agencies are delegated authority to interpret the law, which may be shown in pertinent part “by an agency’s power to engage in adjudication or notice-and-comment rulemak-ing[.]”). 2016United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 226-27 , 121 S.Ct. 2164 , 150 L.Ed.2d 292 (2001) (clarifying that Chevron deference applies where agencies are delegated authority to interpret the law, which may be shown in pertinent part “by an agency’s power to engage in adjudication or notice-and-comment rulemak-ing[.]”). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
green
2 sentences2014Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 161 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 . 2014Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 161 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.