Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1918–1951 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
World Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Tapp
neutral
2 sentences1951This Court, after reversing a long line of decisions holding the iron safe clause unenforceable in Kentucky, first recognized the clause as a valid controlling stipulation in the case of World Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Tapp, 279 Ky. 432 , 130 S.W.2d 848, 852 , but we placed this limitation upon its application: “The provision is subject, however, to a fair and reasonable interpretation and to the demand that a fair and substantial compliance therewith shall be sufficient.” The Tapp case is followed and cited with approval in the later opinion of Watkins v. California Insurance Co., 296 Ky 1944In World Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Tapp, 279 Ky. 423 , 130 S. W. (2d) 848, 851 , this court, contrary to its previous rulings, held that the iron safe clause, common to most fire insurance policies covering merchandise, is a valid contractual stipulation. | 2 | 1944–1951 |
Mabe v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1951This Court, after reversing a long line of decisions holding the iron safe clause unenforceable in Kentucky, first recognized the clause as a valid controlling stipulation in the case of World Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Tapp, 279 Ky. 432 , 130 S.W.2d 848, 852 , but we placed this limitation upon its application: “The provision is subject, however, to a fair and reasonable interpretation and to the demand that a fair and substantial compliance therewith shall be sufficient.” The Tapp case is followed and cited with approval in the later opinion of Watkins v. California Insurance Co., 296 Ky | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Watkins v. California Ins. Co. of San Francisco, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences1951This Court, after reversing a long line of decisions holding the iron safe clause unenforceable in Kentucky, first recognized the clause as a valid controlling stipulation in the case of World Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Tapp, 279 Ky. 432 , 130 S.W.2d 848, 852 , but we placed this limitation upon its application: “The provision is subject, however, to a fair and reasonable interpretation and to the demand that a fair and substantial compliance therewith shall be sufficient.” The Tapp case is followed and cited with approval in the later opinion of Watkins v. California Insurance Co., 296 Ky 1951This Court, after reversing a long line of decisions holding the iron safe clause unenforceable in Kentucky, first recognized the clause as a valid controlling stipulation in the case of World Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Tapp, 279 Ky. 432 , 130 S.W.2d 848, 852 , but we placed this limitation upon its application: “The provision is subject, however, to a fair and reasonable interpretation and to the demand that a fair and substantial compliance therewith shall be sufficient.” The Tapp case is followed and cited with approval in the later opinion of Watkins v. California Insurance Co., 296 Ky | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Fidelity-Phoenix Fire Insurance Co. v. Hyden
neutral
1 sentence1928The circuit court, as a matter of course, will take such action as may be necessary to protect the parties to this suit and the rights of the attaching creditors. *347 Argument is again advanced that the iron-safe clause in the policy of insurance should be held valid, but we have disposed of that question in the case of Fidelity-Phoenix Fire Insurance Co. v. Hyden (Ky.) 10 S.W.(2d) 829 , 226 Ky. 346 . | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. Shapoff
neutral
1 sentence1928The next case from this court is Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Shapoff, 179 Ky. 804 , 201 S. W. 1116 . | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Ætna Insurance v. Mount
green
1 sentence1918Among the cases are: Aetna Insurance Co. v. Mount, 90 Miss. 642 ; Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Dorsey, 102 Miss. 81 ; Insurance Company v. Bourgeois, 105 Miss. 698 ; Penix v. American Central Insurance Company, 106 Miss. 145 . | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Phenix Insurance v. Dorsey
neutral
1 sentence1918Among the cases are: Aetna Insurance Co. v. Mount, 90 Miss. 642 ; Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Dorsey, 102 Miss. 81 ; Insurance Company v. Bourgeois, 105 Miss. 698 ; Penix v. American Central Insurance Company, 106 Miss. 145 . | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Phoenix Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Bourgeois
neutral
1 sentence1918Among the cases are: Aetna Insurance Co. v. Mount, 90 Miss. 642 ; Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Dorsey, 102 Miss. 81 ; Insurance Company v. Bourgeois, 105 Miss. 698 ; Penix v. American Central Insurance Company, 106 Miss. 145 . | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Penix v. American Central Ins.
neutral
1 sentence1918Among the cases are: Aetna Insurance Co. v. Mount, 90 Miss. 642 ; Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Dorsey, 102 Miss. 81 ; Insurance Company v. Bourgeois, 105 Miss. 698 ; Penix v. American Central Insurance Company, 106 Miss. 145 . | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.