admission was harmless error (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

admission was harmless error in Louisiana

5 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2001 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Schneble v. Floridagreen
scotus · 1972 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1998–1999
2 sentences

1999Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 430 , 92 S.Ct. 1056, 1059 , 31 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972) (`In some cases the properly admitted evidence of guilt is so overwhelming, and the prejudicial effect of the codefendant's admission is so insignificant by comparison, that it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the improper use of the admission was harmless error.')" State v. Lamothe, 98-2056 (La.11/25/98), 722 So.2d 987 .

1999Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 430 , 92 S.Ct. 1056, 1059 , 31 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972) (`In some cases the properly admitted evidence of guilt is so overwhelming, and the prejudicial effect of the codefendant's admission is so insignificant by comparison, that it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the improper use of the admission was harmless error.')" State v. Lamothe, 98-2056 (La.11/25/98), 722 So.2d 987 .

12
State v. Heacoxgreen
lactapp · 1989 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
1 sentence

1997In State v. Fisher, 94-2255 (La.App. 1st Cir. 12/15/95), 669 So.2d 460 , writ denied, 96-0958 (La.9/20/96), 679 So.2d 432 , the court reversed the conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon and ordered the defendant released holding that, although the defendant was clearly aware of the gun's presence in the vehicle, there was no evidence his intent amounted to an intent to possess the gun rather than mere acquiescence to the fact his sister owned a gun and had the gun in her purse, citing State v. Heacox, 543 So.2d at 106 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Koon green
la · 1997
1 sentence

2001As noted in State v. Koon, 96-1208 (La.5/20/97), 704 So.2d 756 : The State argues that even if the statement should have been suppressed, any error in admitting the statement was harmless.

12001–2001
State v. Lamothe neutral
la · 1998
1 sentence

1999Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 430 , 92 S.Ct. 1056, 1059 , 31 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972) (`In some cases the properly admitted evidence of guilt is so overwhelming, and the prejudicial effect of the codefendant's admission is so insignificant by comparison, that it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the improper use of the admission was harmless error.')" State v. Lamothe, 98-2056 (La.11/25/98), 722 So.2d 987 .

11999–1999
State v. Demery green
la · 1975
1 sentence

1999In State v. Demery , this Court rejected complaints over the prosecutor's description of the defendant as a "gunslinger," observing that the "evidence ... justifie[d] the inference" as defendant himself had testified that he was always armed and had shot at the victim earlier in the day. 324 So.2d at 420 .

11999–1999
State v. Fisher green
lactapp · 1995
1 sentence

1997In State v. Fisher, 94-2255 (La.App. 1st Cir. 12/15/95), 669 So.2d 460 , writ denied, 96-0958 (La.9/20/96), 679 So.2d 432 , the court reversed the conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon and ordered the defendant released holding that, although the defendant was clearly aware of the gun's presence in the vehicle, there was no evidence his intent amounted to an intent to possess the gun rather than mere acquiescence to the fact his sister owned a gun and had the gun in her purse, citing State v. Heacox, 543 So.2d at 106 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989).

11997–1997
State v. Fisher green
la · 1996
1 sentence

1997In State v. Fisher, 94-2255 (La.App. 1st Cir. 12/15/95), 669 So.2d 460 , writ denied, 96-0958 (La.9/20/96), 679 So.2d 432 , the court reversed the conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon and ordered the defendant released holding that, although the defendant was clearly aware of the gun's presence in the vehicle, there was no evidence his intent amounted to an intent to possess the gun rather than mere acquiescence to the fact his sister owned a gun and had the gun in her purse, citing State v. Heacox, 543 So.2d at 106 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989).

11997–1997

Where else courts name it

OH 19 (1980–2018) GA 12 (1977–2021) SC 10 (1976–2021) PA 9 (1992–2022) IL 6 (1975–1992) LA 5 (1997–2001) MI 4 (1991–2006) OK 4 (1973–1992) MN 4 (1984–2008) FL 4 (1987–2021) IN 4 (1978–2012) AL 4 (1983–1996) MD 3 (1972–1981) TX 3 (1975–2015) AR 3 (1989–2004) KS 3 (1989–1996) NV 3 (1981–1998) NC 3 (1972–2005) MA 2 (1978–2014) DC 2 (1974–2004) IA 2 (1997–2016) WA 2 (2005–2013) ME 2 (1977–1998) NY 2 (2003–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check