Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lingo v. Lingogreen1 sentence2019App. 2 Cir. 4/11/18), 249 So.3d 932, 938 (“A local court rule cannot deprive a litigant of his right to access to the court … the parties, hearing officer, and original judge operated as if there had been a tacit waiver of the local court provision” setting deadline for filing written objections). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Umezulike
green
1 sentence2026V, §1, providing that “[t]he judicial power is vested in a supreme court, courts of appeal, district courts, and other courts authorized by this Article.” Umezulike, 03-1404, p. 4, 866 So. 2d at 797-798 . 6 commissioner acting pursuant to a statute the legislature had the authority to enact, the hearing officer in this matter acted pursuant to a local court rule that directly contravenes statutes enacted by the legislature. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
C.G.D. v. M.W.D.
green
1 sentence2011Kathleen cites C.G.D. v. M.W.D., 2000-1492 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/28/01) , 782 So.2d 1128 , in which the appellate court held that child-support recommendations by the hearing officer constituted a final judgment, and were not subject to additions by trial court, where neither of the ex-spouses contested the recommendations within the three-day period after the hearing prescribed by the local court rule. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Boudreaux v. Yancey
green
1 sentence1991In Louisiana Hoop Company, Inc. v. Hood, 292 So.2d 808 (La.App. 1st Cir.1974), the Twenty-Third Judicial District Court had a rule that was similar to the local court rule considered in Boudreaux v. Yancey, supra. Both rules provided for dismissal of a case or the entry of a default judgment due to failure of counsel to appear at a pre-trial conference. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Louisiana Hoop Company, Inc. v. Hood
green
1 sentence1991In Louisiana Hoop Company, Inc. v. Hood, 292 So.2d 808 (La.App. 1st Cir.1974), the Twenty-Third Judicial District Court had a rule that was similar to the local court rule considered in Boudreaux v. Yancey, supra. Both rules provided for dismissal of a case or the entry of a default judgment due to failure of counsel to appear at a pre-trial conference. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Futch v. Coumes
neutral
1 sentence1977We granted certiorari, 341 So.2d 413 (La.1977), to review the refusal of the district court to consider the application of the plaintiff-relators to proceed in forma pauperis, as well as to determine the validity of the local court rule upon which the district judge based his refusal. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.