Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nnoli v. Nnoli
green
2 sentences2007Nnoli v. Nnoli, 389 Md. 315, 324 , 884 A.2d 1215 (2005). 2007Nnoli v. Nnoli, 389 Md. 315, 324 , 884 A.2d 1215 (2005). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Bing Fa Yuen v. State
green
2 sentences1991Jacobson v. Julian, 246 Md. 549 , 229 A.2d 108 (1966); Yuen v. State, 43 Md.App. 109 , 403 A.2d 819 (1979), cert. denied, 286 Md. 756 (1980). 1991Jacobson v. Julian, 246 Md. 549 , 229 A.2d 108 (1966); Yuen v. State, 43 Md.App. 109 , 403 A.2d 819 (1979), cert. denied, 286 Md. 756 (1980). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
JACOBSON, T/A CHECKER CAB ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Julian
green
2 sentences1991Jacobson v. Julian, 246 Md. 549 , 229 A.2d 108 (1966); Yuen v. State, 43 Md.App. 109 , 403 A.2d 819 (1979), cert. denied, 286 Md. 756 (1980). 1991Jacobson v. Julian, 246 Md. 549 , 229 A.2d 108 (1966); Yuen v. State, 43 Md.App. 109 , 403 A.2d 819 (1979), cert. denied, 286 Md. 756 (1980). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
green
2 sentences1983As we stated in Peat, supra: “This doctrine, recently applied in the criminal context by this Court in Stewart v. State, 282 Md. 557, 571 , 386 A.2d *164 1206, 1213 (1978), and Jolley v. State, supra, 282 Md. at 357, 384 A.2d at 94 , was first articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 [1225-26], 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), in dealing with the appealability of an order denying a motion for the posting of security for costs under the federal appeals statute that is similar to section 12-301. 1983As we stated in Peat, supra: “This doctrine, recently applied in the criminal context by this Court in Stewart v. State, 282 Md. 557, 571 , 386 A.2d *164 1206, 1213 (1978), and Jolley v. State, supra, 282 Md. at 357, 384 A.2d at 94 , was first articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 [1225-26], 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), in dealing with the appealability of an order denying a motion for the posting of security for costs under the federal appeals statute that is similar to section 12-301. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Stewart v. State
green
1 sentence1983As we stated in Peat, supra: “This doctrine, recently applied in the criminal context by this Court in Stewart v. State, 282 Md. 557, 571 , 386 A.2d *164 1206, 1213 (1978), and Jolley v. State, supra, 282 Md. at 357, 384 A.2d at 94 , was first articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 [1225-26], 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), in dealing with the appealability of an order denying a motion for the posting of security for costs under the federal appeals statute that is similar to section 12-301. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Jolley v. State
green
1 sentence1983As we stated in Peat, supra: “This doctrine, recently applied in the criminal context by this Court in Stewart v. State, 282 Md. 557, 571 , 386 A.2d *164 1206, 1213 (1978), and Jolley v. State, supra, 282 Md. at 357, 384 A.2d at 94 , was first articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 [1225-26], 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), in dealing with the appealability of an order denying a motion for the posting of security for costs under the federal appeals statute that is similar to section 12-301. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Pearlman v. State
green
1 sentence1969Pearlman v. State, 226 Md. 67 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Greathouse v. State
green
1 sentence1969Greathouse v. State, 5 Md. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.