Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Murphy v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
green
2 sentences2024Although the Supreme Court held in Murphy that the Chief Judge had the authority to issue administrative orders tolling statutes of limitations in light of the 11 COVID-19 public health emergency, 478 Md. at 385-86 , Murphy did not address conditions precedent to the State’s waiver of sovereign immunity. 2024Although the Supreme Court held in Murphy that the Chief Judge had the authority to issue administrative orders tolling statutes of limitations in light of the 11 COVID-19 public health emergency, 478 Md. at 385-86 , Murphy did not address conditions precedent to the State’s waiver of sovereign immunity. | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Standiford v. Standiford
green
2 sentences2018As we pointed out in rejecting a judicially-created exception for spousal communications, "[h]ad the General Assembly intended an exception for the interception of [such] communications ..., it would have specifically provided one, as it did with respect to the use of extension telephones." Standiford , 89 Md. 2018App. at 337 , 598 A.2d 495 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
St. Joseph Medical Center, Inc. v. Cardiac Surgery Associates, P.A.
green
1 sentence2016Id. at 98-99, 896 A.2d 304 (emphasis in original). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Bruce v. State
neutral
2 sentences2001Substantially in accord with the view above expressed is Bruce v. State, 96 Md.App. 510 , 625 A.2d 416 (1993). 2001Substantially in accord with the view above expressed is Bruce v. State, 96 Md.App. 510 , 625 A.2d 416 (1993). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.