Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1924–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Getz v. Johnston
green
2 sentences1972In Getz v. Johnson, 145 Md. 426, 433 , Judge Mitchell Digges for the Court said: “This involves an inquiry as to whether this Court, by its opinion and mandate in the former case, reported in 143 Md. 543 , did or did not award the costs. * * * “If it did, it is equally well settled by reason and authority that the Circuit Court of Baltimore City was bound to respect, and give validity to, such award, it had no discretion as to the payment of costs, and could pass no valid decree or order in respect thereto, which was not in conformity with the opinion and mandate of this Court. 1924This involves an inquiry as to whether this Court, by its opinion and mandate in the former case, reported in 143 Md. 543 , did or did not award the costs. | 2 | 1924–1972 |
Gilchrist v. State
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 470 (quoting Gilchrist v. State, 340 Md. at 618 ). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Marquardt v. State
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 470 (quoting Gilchrist v. State, 340 Md. at 618 ). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Williams v. State
green
1 sentence2007Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Brady v. State
green
2 sentences1981The Court of Special Appeals found that there was "neither incarceration nor could there have been anxiety or concern in the absence of knowledge.” 46 Md. 1981The Court of Special Appeals found that there was "neither incarceration nor could there have been anxiety or concern in the absence of knowledge." 46 Md. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Maloy v. McLean
neutral
1 sentence1972Maloy v. McLean, 140 Md. 306 .” Order reversed, costs to be paid by appellee. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Getz v. Johnston
green
1 sentence1972In Getz v. Johnson, 145 Md. 426, 433 , Judge Mitchell Digges for the Court said: “This involves an inquiry as to whether this Court, by its opinion and mandate in the former case, reported in 143 Md. 543 , did or did not award the costs. * * * “If it did, it is equally well settled by reason and authority that the Circuit Court of Baltimore City was bound to respect, and give validity to, such award, it had no discretion as to the payment of costs, and could pass no valid decree or order in respect thereto, which was not in conformity with the opinion and mandate of this Court. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.