Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Horn
green
2 sentences2001In People v. Horn, 12 Cal.3d 290 , 115 Cal.Rptr. 516 , 524 P.2d 1300 (1974), the court, in dicta, considered the effect of the statutory change, and, in so doing, determined that a conspiracy could take the form of conspiracy to commit first or second degree murder or manslaughter. 2 That conclusion was based on three factors: the then-existing availability of a diminished capacity defense, the then-existing requirement that, to establish premeditation, the State must show that the defendant could “maturely and meaningfully reflect upon the gravity of his contemplated act,” and the change to § 2001In People v. Horn, 12 Cal.3d 290 , 115 Cal.Rptr. 516 , 524 P.2d 1300 (1974), the court, in dicta, considered the effect of the statutory change, and, in so doing, determined that a conspiracy could take the form of conspiracy to commit first or second degree murder or manslaughter. 2 That conclusion was based on three factors: the then-existing availability of a diminished capacity defense, the then-existing requirement that, to establish premeditation, the State must show that the defendant could “maturely and meaningfully reflect upon the gravity of his contemplated act,” and the change to § | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Ragland v. State
green
2 sentences2014In Ragland , the Court of Appeals reviewed both these rules under the then-existing standard and concluded it was appropriate to prohibit admission as “lay opinion” testimony that is based on “specialized knowledge, skill, experience, training or education.” 385 Md. at 725 , 870 A.2d 609 . 2014In Ragland , the Court of Appeals reviewed both these rules under the then-existing standard and concluded it was appropriate to prohibit admission as “lay opinion” testimony that is based on “specialized knowledge, skill, experience, training or education.” 385 Md. at 725 , 870 A.2d 609 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Berlin v. Aluisi
green
2 sentences1986Since a statute should be given a constitutional construction when that is possible, Berlin v. Aluisi, 57 Md.App. 390 , 470 A.2d 388 (1984), our view that the 1980 legislation did not affect the 1976 immunity waiver is reinforced. 1986Since a statute should be given a constitutional construction when that is possible, Berlin v. Aluisi, 57 Md.App. 390 , 470 A.2d 388 (1984), our view that the 1980 legislation did not affect the 1976 immunity waiver is reinforced. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences1982We expressed the view that the then existing rule had become unsound in light of modern trial conditions, stating ( 292 Md. at 218 , 438 A.2d at 1309 ): "Today, with the complexity of many criminal trials and the absolute right of counsel if there is a danger of incarceration, our system proceeds upon the assumption that it is primarily counsel's function to assert or waive most `rights' of the defendant. 1982We expressed the view that the then existing rule had become unsound in light of modern trial conditions, stating ( 292 Md. at 218 , 438 A.2d at 1309 ): "Today, with the complexity of many criminal trials and the absolute right of counsel if there is a danger of incarceration, our system proceeds upon the assumption that it is primarily counsel's function to assert or waive most `rights' of the defendant. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.