Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ali Bazzi v. Sentinel Insurance Company
green
2 sentences2020In its written opinion and order denying the ACIA’s motion, the trial court stated it was relying on our Supreme Court’s decision in Bazzi v Sentinel Ins Co, 502 Mich 390 ; 919 NW2d 20 (2018) and concluded that ACIA was not “automatically entitled to rescind policies” as they apply to third parties, even when fraud is involved. 2020In its written opinion and order denying the ACIA’s motion, the trial court stated it was relying on our Supreme Court’s decision in Bazzi v Sentinel Ins Co, 502 Mich 390 ; 919 NW2d 20 (2018) and concluded that ACIA was not “automatically entitled to rescind policies” as they apply to third parties, even when fraud is involved. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Turner v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n
green
1 sentence2019Id. at 27 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLC
green
2 sentences2016In rejecting ACIA’s claim, this Court held: “On the other hand, ACIA did not provide documentary evidence that identified specific facts to show that there was a dispute of material fact over whether the charges for medical services were Munson’s customary charges.” We find an almost identical factual situation in this case. -4- “An abuse of discretion occurs when the court’s decision results in an outcome that falls outside the range of principled outcomes.” Epps v 4 Quarters Restoration LLC, 498 Mich 518, 528 ; 872 NW2d 412 (2015). 2016In rejecting ACIA’s claim, this Court held: “On the other hand, ACIA did not provide documentary evidence that identified specific facts to show that there was a dispute of material fact over whether the charges for medical services were Munson’s customary charges.” We find an almost identical factual situation in this case. -4- “An abuse of discretion occurs when the court’s decision results in an outcome that falls outside the range of principled outcomes.” Epps v 4 Quarters Restoration LLC, 498 Mich 518, 528 ; 872 NW2d 412 (2015). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Cooper v. Jenkins
neutral
2 sentences2015ACIA was correct that MCL 500.3177(1) “allows an insurer paying benefits in a case involving an uninsured vehicle to seek reimbursement from the owner of that vehicle.” Cooper v Jenkins, 282 Mich App 486, 490 ; 766 NW2d 671 (2009). 2015ACIA was correct that MCL 500.3177(1) “allows an insurer paying benefits in a case involving an uninsured vehicle to seek reimbursement from the owner of that vehicle.” Cooper v Jenkins, 282 Mich App 486, 490 ; 766 NW2d 671 (2009). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Matich v. Modern Research Corp.
green
1 sentence1989Affirmed. 1 Acia’s brief raises three issues: (1) Postjudgment interest does not accrue during the period between acia’s offer of payment on August 6, 1985, and the unsuccessful conclusion of plaintiff’s appeal to this Court on January 16, 1987; (2) If so, no interest accrues on the $100,000 portion of the judgment which acia offered to pay on August 6, 1985; (3) If postjudgment interest accrues after August 6, 1985, William Dean, rather than acia, is liable for such interest. 2 See Quality Molding Co v American National Fire Ins Co, 287 F2d 313 (CA 7, 1961); Jesser v Mayfair Hotel, Inc, 360 S | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Jesser v. Mayfair Hotel, Inc.
green
1 sentence1989Affirmed. 1 Acia’s brief raises three issues: (1) Postjudgment interest does not accrue during the period between acia’s offer of payment on August 6, 1985, and the unsuccessful conclusion of plaintiff’s appeal to this Court on January 16, 1987; (2) If so, no interest accrues on the $100,000 portion of the judgment which acia offered to pay on August 6, 1985; (3) If postjudgment interest accrues after August 6, 1985, William Dean, rather than acia, is liable for such interest. 2 See Quality Molding Co v American National Fire Ins Co, 287 F2d 313 (CA 7, 1961); Jesser v Mayfair Hotel, Inc, 360 S | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Laramie Valley Railway Co. v. Gradert
green
1 sentence1989Affirmed. 1 Acia’s brief raises three issues: (1) Postjudgment interest does not accrue during the period between acia’s offer of payment on August 6, 1985, and the unsuccessful conclusion of plaintiff’s appeal to this Court on January 16, 1987; (2) If so, no interest accrues on the $100,000 portion of the judgment which acia offered to pay on August 6, 1985; (3) If postjudgment interest accrues after August 6, 1985, William Dean, rather than acia, is liable for such interest. 2 See Quality Molding Co v American National Fire Ins Co, 287 F2d 313 (CA 7, 1961); Jesser v Mayfair Hotel, Inc, 360 S | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.