adjustment waiver (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

adjustment waiver in Michigan

5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1913–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service Commissiongreen
mich · 1982 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994See Detroit Edison Co v Michigan Public Service Comm, 416 Mich 510 ; 331 NW2d 159 (1982).

1994See Detroit Edison Co v Michigan Public Service Comm, 416 Mich 510 ; 331 NW2d 159 (1982).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Dahrooge v. Rochester German Insurance green
mich · 1913
2 sentences

1982It concluded, after a two and one-half page discussion of the matter, that there had been no showing that the doctrine of waiver and estoppel applied, since *50 "[i]t has been frequently held that mere negotiations for an adjustment are not a waiver of limitations, especially where they do not cause delay beyond the period in which action may be brought." Dahrooge, supra, 177 Mich 454 .

1982It concluded, after a two and one-half page discussion of the matter, that there had been no showing that the doctrine of waiver and estoppel applied, since "[i]t has been frequently held that mere negotiations for an adjustment are not a waiver of limitations, especially where they do not cause delay beyond the period in which action may be brought.” Dahrooge, supra, 177 Mich 454 .

21982–1982
Giffels v. the Home Insurance Co. green
michctapp · 1969
1 sentence

2008Id. at 153 .

12008–2008
McFarland & Steele v. Peabody Insurance Co. neutral
wva · 1873
1 sentence

1913McFarland & Steele v. Insurance Co., 6 W.

11913–1913

Where else courts name it

IL 14 (1902–2023) CA 11 (1924–2026) NY 9 (1882–2002) IN 8 (1882–2005) TX 6 (1917–2016) NC 6 (1916–1953) MI 5 (1913–2008) AL 4 (1921–2013) KY 4 (2006–2016) AZ 3 (1978–2001) FL 3 (1980–2015) IA 2 (1920–1942) MD 2 (1986–2005) LA 2 (1933–1993) OH 2 (1959–1986) NJ 2 (1975–1988) MO 2 (1892–2015) WV 2 (1949–2013) NE 2 (1911–1953) VT 2 (1908–2016) WA 2 (1987–2024) CO 2 (2002–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check