5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Eisengreen2 sentences2014Id. at 501-502 ; see also People v Eisen, 296 Mich App 326, 330-331 ; 820 NW2d 229 (2012) (omission of age element of first-degree CSC offense did not require reversal where the verdict form contained the age requirement and the evidence was overwhelming). 2014Id. at 501-502 ; see also People v Eisen, 296 Mich App 326, 330-331 ; 820 NW2d 229 (2012) (omission of age element of first-degree CSC offense did not require reversal where the verdict form contained the age requirement and the evidence was overwhelming). | 1 | 1 |
Lytle v. Maladygreen2 sentences2001See Lytle, supra, 209 Mich.App. at 187-188 , 530 N.W.2d 135 . 2001See Lytle, supra, 209 Mich.App. at 187-188 , 530 N.W.2d 135 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Gravedoni
green
1 sentence2023The amended version was not in effect at the time of the commission of the alleged offenses, Jackson, 179 Mich App at 351 , and the Legislature failed to provide for release or relinquishment of the repealed portion of the statute thereby validating application of the statute as it formerly existed, Gravedoni, 172 Mich App at 197-198 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Jackson
green
1 sentence2023The amended version was not in effect at the time of the commission of the alleged offenses, Jackson, 179 Mich App at 351 , and the Legislature failed to provide for release or relinquishment of the repealed portion of the statute thereby validating application of the statute as it formerly existed, Gravedoni, 172 Mich App at 197-198 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Kowalski
green
1 sentence2014Id. at 501-502 ; see also People v Eisen, 296 Mich App 326, 330-331 ; 820 NW2d 229 (2012) (omission of age element of first-degree CSC offense did not require reversal where the verdict form contained the age requirement and the evidence was overwhelming). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Craig v. Larson
green
2 sentences2000The Legislature once again amended the Liquor Control Act in 1972, changing the age requirement in MCL 436.33b; MSA 18.1004(2) to eighteen, 1972 PA 13 , before making more significant changes in 1978. 1978 PA 94 made it a misdemeanor for a person under the age of nineteen to purchase or consume alcohol in a licensed establishment or simply to possess alcohol. 1978 PA 531 , however, increased the drinking age to twenty-one and changed the wording of MCL 436.33b(l); MSA 18.1004(2)(1) to prohibit a person under that age from “purchasfing] alcoholic liquor, consum[ing] alcoholic liquor in a licens 2000The Legislature once again amended the Liquor Control Act in 1972, changing the age requirement in MCL 436.33b; MSA 18.1004(2) to eighteen, 1972 PA 13 , before making more significant changes in 1978. 1978 PA 94 made it a misdemeanor for a person under the age of nineteen to purchase or consume alcohol in a licensed establishment or simply to possess alcohol. 1978 PA 531 , however, increased the drinking age to twenty-one and changed the wording of MCL 436.33b(l); MSA 18.1004(2)(1) to prohibit a person under that age from “purchasfing] alcoholic liquor, consum[ing] alcoholic liquor in a licens | 1 | 2000–2000 |
People v. Gengels
green
2 sentences1984Over 61 years ago, this Court enunciated a rule rejecting such a defense in People v Gengels, 218 Mich 632 ; 188 NW 398 (1922), which involved a similar charge under the former statutory rape statute. 1984Over 61 years ago, this Court enunciated a rule rejecting such a defense in People v Gengels, 218 Mich 632 ; 188 NW 398 (1922), which involved a similar charge under the former statutory rape statute. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.