9 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thorson v. Stategreen1 sentence2019The Flynn Effect “is a phenomenon positing that, over time, standardized IQ test scores tend to increase with the age of the test without a corresponding increase in actual intelligence in the general population.” Thorson v. State, 76 So. 3d 667, 672 (Miss. 2011) (quoting Wiley v. Epps, 625 F.3d 199 , 203 n.1 (5th Cir. 2010)). | 1 | 1 |
In Re: Robert Madrid Salazar, Movantgreen1 sentence2011Those who follow the Flynn Effect adjust for it by deducting from the IQ score a specified amount for each year since the test was normalized.” Wiley v. Epps, 625 F.3d 199 , 203 n. 1 (5th Cir.2010) (citing In re Salazar, 443 F.3d 430 n. 1 (5th Cir.2006)). ¶ 8. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Collins v. State
green
2 sentences1999Collins v. State, 691 So.2d 918 (Miss.1997). 1999Collins v. State, 691 So.2d 918 (Miss.1997). | 5 | 1996–1999 |
William Wiley v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner
green
2 sentences2019The Flynn Effect “is a phenomenon positing that, over time, standardized IQ test scores tend to increase with the age of the test without a corresponding increase in actual intelligence in the general population.” Thorson v. State, 76 So. 3d 667, 672 (Miss. 2011) (quoting Wiley v. Epps, 625 F.3d 199 , 203 n.1 (5th Cir. 2010)). 2011Those who follow the Flynn Effect adjust for it by deducting from the IQ score a specified amount for each year since the test was normalized.” Wiley v. Epps, 625 F.3d 199 , 203 n. 1 (5th Cir.2010) (citing In re Salazar, 443 F.3d 430 n. 1 (5th Cir.2006)). ¶ 8. | 3 | 2010–2019 |
Peterson v. State
green
1 sentence2019Peterson contended the statute’s age requirement, which made him ineligible for parole or conditional release, “violate[d] his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and the comparative portions of the Mississippi Constitution” because the statute “unfairly require[d] a younger prisoner to serve a longer sentence than an older prisoner.” Id. at (¶¶2, 5). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.