Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Washington State Legislature v. Stategreen1 sentence2021Locke, 139 Wn.2d at 147 (copayment provision in appropriations bill “add[ed] restrictions to public assistance eligibility”); Flanders, 88 Wn.2d at 185 (appropriations provision defined eligibility for services where it created an age requirement that did not exist in the codified welfare statute). | 1 | 1 |
Flanders v. Morrisgreen1 sentence2021Locke, 139 Wn.2d at 147 (copayment provision in appropriations bill “add[ed] restrictions to public assistance eligibility”); Flanders, 88 Wn.2d at 185 (appropriations provision defined eligibility for services where it created an age requirement that did not exist in the codified welfare statute). | 1 | 1 |
Robertson v. O'Neillgreen2 sentences1954See Robertson v. O’Neill, 67 Wash. 121 , 120 Pac. 884 (1912); McAllister v. Chambers, 71 Wash. 521 , 129 Pac. 85 (1913); 9 A. L. 1954See Robertson v. O’Neill, 67 Wash. 121 , 120 Pac. 884 (1912); McAllister v. Chambers, 71 Wash. 521 , 129 Pac. 85 (1913); 9 A. L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hodgson
green
2 sentences2007The court found this argument unpersuasive, reasoning that because RCW 26.04.010 "allows for marriage under the age of 17 when the age requirement `has been waived by a superior court judge . . . on a showing of necessity' . . . [N]onmarriage is not an element implicit in first degree statutory rape." Id. (emphasis added) (first alteration in original). 2007The court found this argument unpersuasive, reasoning that because RCW 26.04.010 “allows for marriage under the age of 17 when the age requirement ‘has been waived by a superior court judge ... on a showing of necessity’. . . , nonmarriage is not an element implicit in first degree statutory rape.” Id. (emphasis added) (first alteration in original). | 3 | 1988–2007 |
Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015Servs., Inc., 164 Wn.2d 432 , 191 P.3d 879 (2008). 7 “I’m not going to make any rulings at this point as to whether or not the door has been opened on the age claim. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015Servs., Inc., 164 Wn.2d 432 , 191 P.3d 879 (2008). 7 “I’m not going to make any rulings at this point as to whether or not the door has been opened on the age claim. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Scoby
green
1 sentence1992In this case, the manner in which the trial court segregated attorney's fees incurred on the age claim from attorney's fees incurred on other claims was reasonable, Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc., 117 Wn.2d 426, 450 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991), and there was no abuse of discretion. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc.
green
1 sentence1992In this case, the manner in which the trial court segregated attorney's fees incurred on the age claim from attorney's fees incurred on other claims was reasonable, Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc., 117 Wn.2d 426, 450 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991), and there was no abuse of discretion. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
McAllister v. Chambers
neutral
2 sentences1954See Robertson v. O’Neill, 67 Wash. 121 , 120 Pac. 884 (1912); McAllister v. Chambers, 71 Wash. 521 , 129 Pac. 85 (1913); 9 A. L. 1954See Robertson v. O’Neill, 67 Wash. 121 , 120 Pac. 884 (1912); McAllister v. Chambers, 71 Wash. 521 , 129 Pac. 85 (1913); 9 A. L. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.