case falls principle (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

case falls principle in Michigan

5 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1895–1935 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Anda v. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit Co. neutral
mich · 1925
1 sentence

1935Instead this case falls under the rule of Anda v. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit Co., 231 Mich. 567, 570 , wherein Justice Wiest, writing for the court, said: “Defendant transit company, however, was not required to protect plaintiff from the unforeseen acts of third persons.

11935–1935
Smitley v. Pinch neutral
mich · 1907
1 sentence

1918We think the court was in error in admitting this testimony.” Counsel for appellee admit that this statement of the rule is correct, but it is contended and urged that by filing the plea of justification the defendant assails the reputation of the plaintiff, and that this amounts to a general attack, which permits the plaintiff to rebut the attack by offering evidence to show her good reputation, and that therefore the case falls under the rule announced in Smitley v. Pinch, supra, that where defendant has submitted testimony tending to show plaintiff’s general reputation for chastity to be ba

11918–1918
Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen v. Beath neutral
mich · 1908
2 sentences

1912U. W. v. Beath, 150 Mich. 657 ( 114 N. W. 662 ).

1912U. W. v. Beath, 150 Mich. 657 ( 114 N. W. 662 ).

11912–1912
Hand v. Auditor General neutral
mich · 1897
1 sentence

1899The case falls in principle within the cases oh Hand v. Auditor General, 112 Mich. 597 ; Hough v. Auditor General, 116 Mich. 663 ; Carpenter v. Jones, 117 Mich. 91 ; Kneeland v. Wood, Id. 174 .

11899–1899
Hough v. Auditor General neutral
mich · 1898
1 sentence

1899The case falls in principle within the cases oh Hand v. Auditor General, 112 Mich. 597 ; Hough v. Auditor General, 116 Mich. 663 ; Carpenter v. Jones, 117 Mich. 91 ; Kneeland v. Wood, Id. 174 .

11899–1899
Carpenter v. Jones neutral
mich · 1898
2 sentences

1899The case falls in principle within the cases oh Hand v. Auditor General, 112 Mich. 597 ; Hough v. Auditor General, 116 Mich. 663 ; Carpenter v. Jones, 117 Mich. 91 ; Kneeland v. Wood, Id. 174 .

1899The case falls in principle within the cases oh Hand v. Auditor General, 112 Mich. 597 ; Hough v. Auditor General, 116 Mich. 663 ; Carpenter v. Jones, 117 Mich. 91 ; Kneeland v. Wood, Id. 174 .

11899–1899
Gibbs v. Hanchette green
mich · 1892
1 sentence

1895The case falls in principle within the rule laid down in Gibls v. Hanchette, 90 Mich. 657, 660 , in which.it was said: “The purpose of the statute is that an accurate and truthful claim shall be filed.

11895–1895

Where else courts name it

FL 9 (1989–2020) LA 8 (1908–2022) CA 7 (1957–2023) TX 6 (1914–2021) MI 5 (1895–1935) TN 4 (1963–2014) IN 4 (1983–1993) NY 4 (1912–2021) MS 3 (1916–1996) NC 3 (1877–1980) OH 3 (2005–2013) WA 3 (1955–1980) GA 3 (1962–2025) KY 2 (1909–1951) NE 2 (1911–1916) PA 2 (1908–2008) IL 2 (2005–2005) AL 2 (1964–1981) UT 2 (2016–2020) OR 2 (1986–2009) MO 2 (1970–2015) IA 2 (1981–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check