5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Brighamgreen2 sentences2005United States v Williams, 271 F3d 1262, 1267 (CA 10, 2001). 10 Specifically, an officer may ask about the “purpose and itinerary of a driver’s trip during the traffic stop” in order to determine whether a “violation has taken place, and if so, whether a citation or warning should be issued or an arrest made.” United States v Brigham, 382 F3d 500, 508 (CA 5, 2004). 2005United States v. Williams, 271 F.3d 1262, 1267 (C.A.10, 2001). [10] Specifically, an officer may ask about the "purpose and itinerary of a driver's trip during the traffic stop" in order to determine whether a "violation has taken place, and if so, whether a citation or warning should be issued or an arrest made." United States v. Brigham, 382 F.3d 500, 508 (C.A.5, 2004). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2005United States v Williams, 271 F3d 1262, 1267 (CA 10, 2001). 10 Specifically, an officer may ask about the “purpose and itinerary of a driver’s trip during the traffic stop” in order to determine whether a “violation has taken place, and if so, whether a citation or warning should be issued or an arrest made.” United States v Brigham, 382 F3d 500, 508 (CA 5, 2004). 2005United States v. Williams, 271 F.3d 1262, 1267 (C.A.10, 2001). [10] Specifically, an officer may ask about the "purpose and itinerary of a driver's trip during the traffic stop" in order to determine whether a "violation has taken place, and if so, whether a citation or warning should be issued or an arrest made." United States v. Brigham, 382 F.3d 500, 508 (C.A.5, 2004). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Musser
green
2 sentences2018Our Supreme Court has made clear that “it is improper for a witness or an expert to comment or provide an opinion on the credibility of another person while testifying at trial” because “[s]uch comments have no probative value” and “do nothing to assist the jury in assessing witness credibility in its fact-finding mission and in determining the ultimate issue of guilt or innocence.” People v Musser, 494 Mich 337, 349 ; 835 NW2d 319 (2013) (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2018Our Supreme Court has made clear that “it is improper for a witness or an expert to comment or provide an opinion on the credibility of another person while testifying at trial” because “[s]uch comments have no probative value” and “do nothing to assist the jury in assessing witness credibility in its fact-finding mission and in determining the ultimate issue of guilt or innocence.” People v Musser, 494 Mich 337, 349 ; 835 NW2d 319 (2013) (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Alco Universal Inc. v. City of Flint
green
2 sentences1990Miller v Fabius Twp Bd, n 41, supra, pp 257, 259. [43] See Alco Universal Inc v City of Flint, 386 Mich 359 ; 192 NW2d 247 (1971) (home rule government is based on the theory that local governments are in the best position to assess needs and desires of a community). [44] The ordinance prohibited the "storage of fireworks in a place of retail sales ... to a gross weight of less than one hundred pounds." [45] The plaintiff never conceded, as the 36th District Court noted, that "there is no question but these were class [C] fireworks which were stored on [defendant's] premises" when he was issue 1990Miller v Fabius Twp Bd, n 41, supra, pp 257, 259. [43] See Alco Universal Inc v City of Flint, 386 Mich 359 ; 192 NW2d 247 (1971) (home rule government is based on the theory that local governments are in the best position to assess needs and desires of a community). [44] The ordinance prohibited the "storage of fireworks in a place of retail sales ... to a gross weight of less than one hundred pounds." [45] The plaintiff never conceded, as the 36th District Court noted, that "there is no question but these were class [C] fireworks which were stored on [defendant's] premises" when he was issue | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Smyers
neutral
2 sentences1975People v Smyers, 47 Mich App 61 ; *139 209 NW2d 281 (1973). 1975People v Smyers, 47 Mich App 61 ; *139 209 NW2d 281 (1973). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.