13 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mooregreen2 sentences2009“Once a police officer stops a car for a traffic infraction, the officer is then justified in detaining the driver ‘only for the time reasonably necessary to issue a citation or warning.... ’ ” Sanchez v. State, 847 So.2d 1043, 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (quoting State v. Moore, 791 So.2d 1246, 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)). 2009"Once a police officer stops a car for a traffic infraction, the officer is then justified in detaining the driver `only for the time reasonably necessary to issue a citation or warning....'" Sanchez v. State, 847 So.2d 1043, 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (quoting State v. Moore, 791 So.2d 1246, 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)). | 3 | 3 |
Sanchez v. Stategreen2 sentences2009“Once a police officer stops a car for a traffic infraction, the officer is then justified in detaining the driver ‘only for the time reasonably necessary to issue a citation or warning.... ’ ” Sanchez v. State, 847 So.2d 1043, 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (quoting State v. Moore, 791 So.2d 1246, 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)). 2009"Once a police officer stops a car for a traffic infraction, the officer is then justified in detaining the driver `only for the time reasonably necessary to issue a citation or warning....'" Sanchez v. State, 847 So.2d 1043, 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (quoting State v. Moore, 791 So.2d 1246, 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)). | 2 | 2 |
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Sanchez's Claim that he was Detained Longer than Necessary to Issue a Traffic Citation Once a police officer stops a car for a traffic infraction, the officer is then justified in detaining the driver "only for the time reasonably necessary to issue a citation or warning, ..., unless he ha[s] a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity." State v. Moore, 791 So.2d 1246, 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)(citing Thomas v. State, 614 So.2d 468 (Fla.1993), and Cresswell v. State, 564 So.2d 480 (Fla.1990), among others). 2001See Thomas v. State, 614 So.2d 468 (Fla. 1993); Cresswell v. State, 564 So.2d 480 (Fla.1990); State v. Banfield, 614 So.2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, Banfield v. State, 626 So.2d 203 (Fla.1993). | 1 | 2 |
Hernandez v. Home Depot USA, Inc.green1 sentence2019Co. v. Worthy, 447 So. 2d 998, 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (“An order in limine should only be used as a shield and never to gag the truth and permit other evidence to mislead the jury.”); see also defendant violated a provision of law that is relevant to the determination of negligence simply does not open the door to admitting a law enforcement officer’s decision on whether to issue a citation for that violation.”). 8 Carnival Corp. v. Pajares, 972 So. 2d 973, 975-76 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (holding that closing argument statements commenting on a witness’s failure to offer testimony regarding infor | 1 | 1 |
Carnival Corp. v. Pajaresgreen1 sentence2019Co. v. Worthy, 447 So. 2d 998, 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (“An order in limine should only be used as a shield and never to gag the truth and permit other evidence to mislead the jury.”); see also defendant violated a provision of law that is relevant to the determination of negligence simply does not open the door to admitting a law enforcement officer’s decision on whether to issue a citation for that violation.”). 8 Carnival Corp. v. Pajares, 972 So. 2d 973, 975-76 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (holding that closing argument statements commenting on a witness’s failure to offer testimony regarding infor | 1 | 1 |
Soto v. McCulley Marine Services, Inc.green1 sentence2019See, e.g., Soto, 181 So. 3d at 1226 (“Arguing that a defendant violated a provision of law that is relevant to the determination of negligence simply does not open the door to admitting a law enforcement officer’s decision on whether to issue a citation for that violation.”). 8 Nat’l Mut. | 1 | 1 |
Iowa Nat. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Worthygreen1 sentence2019Co. v. Worthy, 447 So. 2d 998, 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (“An order in limine should only be used as a shield and never to gag the truth and permit other evidence to mislead the jury.”); see also defendant violated a provision of law that is relevant to the determination of negligence simply does not open the door to admitting a law enforcement officer’s decision on whether to issue a citation for that violation.”). 8 Carnival Corp. v. Pajares, 972 So. 2d 973, 975-76 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (holding that closing argument statements commenting on a witness’s failure to offer testimony regarding infor | 1 | 1 |
Houser v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See Mosely v. State, 688 So. 2d 999, 999-1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) ("Because the information recited the appropriate factual description . . . we treat the citation to the incorrect statute as a scrivener's error and remand this case for correction of the judgment . . . ."). -2- 474 So. 2d 1193 , 1197 (Fla. 1985); Rodriguez v. State, 875 So. 2d 642, 645 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). | 1 | 1 |
Mosely v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Mosely v. State, 688 So.2d 999, 999-1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (“Because the information recited the appropriate factual description ... we treat the citation'to the incorrect statute as a scrivener’s error and remand this case for correction of the judgment .... ”). . 2017See Mosely v. State, 688 So. 2d 999, 999-1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) ("Because the information recited the appropriate factual description . . . we treat the citation to the incorrect statute as a scrivener's error and remand this case for correction of the judgment . . . ."). -2- 474 So. 2d 1193 , 1197 (Fla. 1985); Rodriguez v. State, 875 So. 2d 642, 645 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). | 1 | 1 |
Rodriguez v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See Mosely v. State, 688 So. 2d 999, 999-1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) ("Because the information recited the appropriate factual description . . . we treat the citation to the incorrect statute as a scrivener's error and remand this case for correction of the judgment . . . ."). -2- 474 So. 2d 1193 , 1197 (Fla. 1985); Rodriguez v. State, 875 So. 2d 642, 645 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). | 1 | 1 |
Albertson v. Starkgreen1 sentence2014The Fourth District held that jurors “should not be informed of the investigating officer’s determination of who caused the accident and who was cited.” Id. at 452 ; see also Galgano v. Buchanan, 783 So.2d 302, 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding that a party was deprived of a fair trial when the investigating officer was allowed to testify that he issued a citation for violation of the right-of-way and the party paid the citation); Albertson v. Stark, 294 So.2d 698, 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974) (remarking that, to the average juror, the investigating officer’s decision whether to charge one driver or | 1 | 1 |
Galgano v. Buchanangreen1 sentence2014The Fourth District held that jurors “should not be informed of the investigating officer’s determination of who caused the accident and who was cited.” Id. at 452 ; see also Galgano v. Buchanan, 783 So.2d 302, 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding that a party was deprived of a fair trial when the investigating officer was allowed to testify that he issued a citation for violation of the right-of-way and the party paid the citation); Albertson v. Stark, 294 So.2d 698, 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974) (remarking that, to the average juror, the investigating officer’s decision whether to charge one driver or | 1 | 1 |
Herrera v. Stategreen1 sentence2003See, e.g., Herrera v. State, 804 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA) (affirming with citations to a decision of this Court, a decision of the Second District, and a statute), review dismissed, 819 So.2d 135 (Fla.2002); Colonel v. State, 756 So.2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA) (affirming with citations to Strickland and a decision of this Court), review dismissed, 767 So.2d 455 (Fla.2000); Anderson v. State, 748 So.2d 316 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (affirming with citations to three decisions of this Court and a citation to a rule of criminal procedure), review dismissed, 753 So.2d 563 (Fla.2000). [3] Our decision in Florida | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen1 sentence1993See Brown v. State, 577 So.2d 708 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1991); Arnold v. State, 544 So.2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cresswell v. State
green
2 sentences2003Sanchez's Claim that he was Detained Longer than Necessary to Issue a Traffic Citation Once a police officer stops a car for a traffic infraction, the officer is then justified in detaining the driver "only for the time reasonably necessary to issue a citation or warning, ..., unless he ha[s] a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity." State v. Moore, 791 So.2d 1246, 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)(citing Thomas v. State, 614 So.2d 468 (Fla.1993), and Cresswell v. State, 564 So.2d 480 (Fla.1990), among others). 2002However, in order to detain KGM beyond the time necessary to issue a citation or warning, the officer must have “reasonable suspicion based upon articula-ble facts that criminal activity may be afoot.” Id. | 4 | 2001–2003 |
Brown v. State
neutral
1 sentence2023I believe we owe trial courts an explanation when we disturb their orders, and I support the panel opinion’s effort to build on Brown v. State, 666 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), and provide a full foundation for our prior decisions. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Hernandez v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.
green
1 sentence2014The Fourth District held that jurors “should not be informed of the investigating officer’s determination of who caused the accident and who was cited.” Id. at 452 ; see also Galgano v. Buchanan, 783 So.2d 302, 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding that a party was deprived of a fair trial when the investigating officer was allowed to testify that he issued a citation for violation of the right-of-way and the party paid the citation); Albertson v. Stark, 294 So.2d 698, 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974) (remarking that, to the average juror, the investigating officer’s decision whether to charge one driver or | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Colonel v. State
neutral
1 sentence2003See, e.g., Herrera v. State, 804 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA) (affirming with citations to a decision of this Court, a decision of the Second District, and a statute), review dismissed, 819 So.2d 135 (Fla.2002); Colonel v. State, 756 So.2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA) (affirming with citations to Strickland and a decision of this Court), review dismissed, 767 So.2d 455 (Fla.2000); Anderson v. State, 748 So.2d 316 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (affirming with citations to three decisions of this Court and a citation to a rule of criminal procedure), review dismissed, 753 So.2d 563 (Fla.2000). [3] Our decision in Florida | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Anderson v. State
neutral
1 sentence2003See, e.g., Herrera v. State, 804 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA) (affirming with citations to a decision of this Court, a decision of the Second District, and a statute), review dismissed, 819 So.2d 135 (Fla.2002); Colonel v. State, 756 So.2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA) (affirming with citations to Strickland and a decision of this Court), review dismissed, 767 So.2d 455 (Fla.2000); Anderson v. State, 748 So.2d 316 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (affirming with citations to three decisions of this Court and a citation to a rule of criminal procedure), review dismissed, 753 So.2d 563 (Fla.2000). [3] Our decision in Florida | 1 | 2003–2003 |
The Florida Star v. BJF
green
2 sentences2003See, e.g., Herrera v. State, 804 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA) (affirming with citations to a decision of this Court, a decision of the Second District, and a statute), review dismissed, 819 So.2d 135 (Fla.2002); Colonel v. State, 756 So.2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA) (affirming with citations to Strickland and a decision of this Court), review dismissed, 767 So.2d 455 (Fla.2000); Anderson v. State, 748 So.2d 316 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (affirming with citations to three decisions of this Court and a citation to a rule of criminal procedure), review dismissed, 753 So.2d 563 (Fla.2000). [3] Our decision in Florida 2003As we explained in Florida Star , this Court's discretionary review jurisdiction can be invoked only from a district court decision "that expressly addresses a question of law within the four corners of the opinion itself" by "contain[ing] a statement or citation effectively establishing a point of law upon which the decision rests." Florida Star, 530 So.2d at 288 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Banfield
green
1 sentence2001See Thomas v. State, 614 So.2d 468 (Fla. 1993); Cresswell v. State, 564 So.2d 480 (Fla.1990); State v. Banfield, 614 So.2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, Banfield v. State, 626 So.2d 203 (Fla.1993). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Arnold v. State
green
1 sentence1993See Brown v. State, 577 So.2d 708 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1991); Arnold v. State, 544 So.2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.