Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Burgos-Seberos v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Damato, ¶ 13; Burgos-Seberos v. State, 969 P.2d 1131, 1133 (Wyo.1998). 2004Damato, ¶ 13; Burgos-Seberos v. State, 969 P.2d 1131, 1133 (Wyo.1998). | 2 | 2 |
O'BOYLE v. Stategreen2 sentences2020“During a routine traffic stop, an officer may request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning.” Id. (citation omitted). [¶22] Travel plans also are an “acceptable area of limited inquiry during a routine traffic stop.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Frazier v. State, 2010 WY 107, ¶ 12 , 236 P.3d 295, 299 (Wyo. 2010)); see also Ray v. State, 2018 WY 146 , ¶ 19, 432 P.3d 872, 877 (Wyo. 2018) (citing O’Boyle v. State, 2005 WY 83, ¶ 48 , 117 P.3d 401, 414 (Wyo. 2005)) (“Inquiry into travel plans is also perm 2020“During a routine traffic stop, an officer may request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning.” Id. (citation omitted). [¶22] Travel plans also are an “acceptable area of limited inquiry during a routine traffic stop.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Frazier v. State, 2010 WY 107, ¶ 12 , 236 P.3d 295, 299 (Wyo. 2010)); see also Ray v. State, 2018 WY 146 , ¶ 19, 432 P.3d 872, 877 (Wyo. 2018) (citing O’Boyle v. State, 2005 WY 83, ¶ 48 , 117 P.3d 401, 414 (Wyo. 2005)) (“Inquiry into travel plans is also perm | 1 | 3 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2021“During a routine traffic stop, an officer may request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning.” Id. (citation omitted). 2020“During a routine traffic stop, an officer may request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning.” Id. (citation omitted). [¶22] Travel plans also are an “acceptable area of limited inquiry during a routine traffic stop.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Frazier v. State, 2010 WY 107, ¶ 12 , 236 P.3d 295, 299 (Wyo. 2010)); see also Ray v. State, 2018 WY 146 , ¶ 19, 432 P.3d 872, 877 (Wyo. 2018) (citing O’Boyle v. State, 2005 WY 83, ¶ 48 , 117 P.3d 401, 414 (Wyo. 2005)) (“Inquiry into travel plans is also perm | 1 | 2 |
Campbell v. Stategreen2 sentences2019Id. ¶ 12, 97 P.3d at 785 . 2018Id. ¶ 12, 97 P.3d at 785 (citations omitted). | 1 | 2 |
Ray v. Stategreen1 sentence2020“During a routine traffic stop, an officer may request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning.” Id. (citation omitted). [¶22] Travel plans also are an “acceptable area of limited inquiry during a routine traffic stop.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Frazier v. State, 2010 WY 107, ¶ 12 , 236 P.3d 295, 299 (Wyo. 2010)); see also Ray v. State, 2018 WY 146 , ¶ 19, 432 P.3d 872, 877 (Wyo. 2018) (citing O’Boyle v. State, 2005 WY 83, ¶ 48 , 117 P.3d 401, 414 (Wyo. 2005)) (“Inquiry into travel plans is also perm | 1 | 1 |
Frazier v. Stategreen2 sentences2020“During a routine traffic stop, an officer may request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning.” Id. (citation omitted). [¶22] Travel plans also are an “acceptable area of limited inquiry during a routine traffic stop.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Frazier v. State, 2010 WY 107, ¶ 12 , 236 P.3d 295, 299 (Wyo. 2010)); see also Ray v. State, 2018 WY 146 , ¶ 19, 432 P.3d 872, 877 (Wyo. 2018) (citing O’Boyle v. State, 2005 WY 83, ¶ 48 , 117 P.3d 401, 414 (Wyo. 2005)) (“Inquiry into travel plans is also perm 2020“During a routine traffic stop, an officer may request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning.” Id. (citation omitted). [¶22] Travel plans also are an “acceptable area of limited inquiry during a routine traffic stop.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Frazier v. State, 2010 WY 107, ¶ 12 , 236 P.3d 295, 299 (Wyo. 2010)); see also Ray v. State, 2018 WY 146 , ¶ 19, 432 P.3d 872, 877 (Wyo. 2018) (citing O’Boyle v. State, 2005 WY 83, ¶ 48 , 117 P.3d 401, 414 (Wyo. 2005)) (“Inquiry into travel plans is also perm | 1 | 1 |
Lovato v. Stategreen2 sentences2020“However, extensive and prolonged inquiry into the details of a detained driver’s travel plans may be unreasonable.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Lovato v. State, 2010 WY 38, ¶ 27 , 228 P.3d 55, 61 (Wyo. 2010)); see, e.g., O’Boyle, ¶¶ 56–59, 117 P.3d at 416–17 (concluding the trooper’s “extensive questioning” of the driver inside the patrol car about not only his “travel plans and the rental car, but questions far removed from either his travel plans or the speeding violation,” was unreasonable and unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment). 2020“However, extensive and prolonged inquiry into the details of a detained driver’s travel plans may be unreasonable.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Lovato v. State, 2010 WY 38, ¶ 27 , 228 P.3d 55, 61 (Wyo. 2010)); see, e.g., O’Boyle, ¶¶ 56–59, 117 P.3d at 416–17 (concluding the trooper’s “extensive questioning” of the driver inside the patrol car about not only his “travel plans and the rental car, but questions far removed from either his travel plans or the speeding violation,” was unreasonable and unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment). | 1 | 1 |
Negrette v. Stategreen2 sentences2020“During a routine traffic stop, an officer may request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning.” Id. (citation omitted). [¶22] Travel plans also are an “acceptable area of limited inquiry during a routine traffic stop.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Frazier v. State, 2010 WY 107, ¶ 12 , 236 P.3d 295, 299 (Wyo. 2010)); see also Ray v. State, 2018 WY 146 , ¶ 19, 432 P.3d 872, 877 (Wyo. 2018) (citing O’Boyle v. State, 2005 WY 83, ¶ 48 , 117 P.3d 401, 414 (Wyo. 2005)) (“Inquiry into travel plans is also perm 2020“During a routine traffic stop, an officer may request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning.” Id. (citation omitted). [¶22] Travel plans also are an “acceptable area of limited inquiry during a routine traffic stop.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Frazier v. State, 2010 WY 107, ¶ 12 , 236 P.3d 295, 299 (Wyo. 2010)); see also Ray v. State, 2018 WY 146 , ¶ 19, 432 P.3d 872, 877 (Wyo. 2018) (citing O’Boyle v. State, 2005 WY 83, ¶ 48 , 117 P.3d 401, 414 (Wyo. 2005)) (“Inquiry into travel plans is also perm | 1 | 1 |
Rodriguez v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2020“Because addressing the infraction is the purpose of the stop, it may ‘last no longer than is necessary to effectuate that purpose.’” Rodriguez, 575 U.S. at 354 , 135 S.Ct. at 1614 (alteration omitted); see also Brown, 2019 WY 42 , ¶ 20, 439 P.3d at 732 (driver may only be detained for the time necessary to “request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning”). 2020“Because addressing the infraction is the purpose of the stop, it may ‘last no longer than is necessary to effectuate that purpose.’” Rodriguez, 575 U.S. at 354 , 135 S.Ct. at 1614 (alteration omitted); see also Brown, 2019 WY 42 , ¶ 20, 439 P.3d at 732 (driver may only be detained for the time necessary to “request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning”). | 1 | 1 |
Illinois v. Caballesgreen2 sentences2009See Caballes, supra, 543 U.S. 405 , 125 S.Ct. 834 , 160 L.Ed.2d 842 . 2009See Caballes, supra, 543 U.S. 405 , 125 S.Ct. 834 , 160 L.Ed.2d 842 . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Brighamgreen2 sentences2005Specifically, an officer may ask about the “purpose and itinerary of a driver’s trip during the traffic stop” in order to determine whether a “violation has taken place, and if so, whether a citation or warning should be issued or an arrest made.” United States v. Brigham, 382 F.3d 500, 508 (C.A.5, 2004). 2005Such inquiries are “within the scope of investigation attendant to the traffic stop.” Id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Joy Klomliam v. The State of Wyoming
green
2 sentences2020“During a routine traffic stop, an officer may request a driver’s license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning.” Id. (citation omitted). [¶22] Travel plans also are an “acceptable area of limited inquiry during a routine traffic stop.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Frazier v. State, 2010 WY 107, ¶ 12 , 236 P.3d 295, 299 (Wyo. 2010)); see also Ray v. State, 2018 WY 146 , ¶ 19, 432 P.3d 872, 877 (Wyo. 2018) (citing O’Boyle v. State, 2005 WY 83, ¶ 48 , 117 P.3d 401, 414 (Wyo. 2005)) (“Inquiry into travel plans is also perm 2020“However, extensive and prolonged inquiry into the details of a detained driver’s travel plans may be unreasonable.” Klomliam, ¶ 23, 315 P.3d at 671 (quoting Lovato v. State, 2010 WY 38, ¶ 27 , 228 P.3d 55, 61 (Wyo. 2010)); see, e.g., O’Boyle, ¶¶ 56–59, 117 P.3d at 416–17 (concluding the trooper’s “extensive questioning” of the driver inside the patrol car about not only his “travel plans and the rental car, but questions far removed from either his travel plans or the speeding violation,” was unreasonable and unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Knowles v. Iowa
green
1 sentence2000In Knowles, the court was faced with an Towa law that allowed an officer to issue a citation for a violation in lieu of making an arrest. 525 U.S. at 114 , 119 S.Ct. at 486-87 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.