Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Churchman v. Richerson
green
2 sentences2026As Churchman explains, “[i]n the absence of an affidavit that satisfies the closed-head injury exception, a plaintiff may establish a factual question under the broader language set forth in subsection 3135(2)(a)(i) and (ii).” Id. (noting that “a trial court cannot determine whether a plaintiff has suffered a serious impairment of body function and enter judgment in favor of a defendant as a matter of law without first making the factual findings required under subsections 3135(2)(a)(i) or (ii)”). 2007“The language of § 3135 does not indicate, however, that the closed-head injury exception provides the exclusive manner in which a plaintiff who has suffered a closed-head injury may establish a factual dispute precluding summary disposition.” Churchman v Rickerson, 240 Mich App 223, 232 ; 611 NW2d 333 (2000). | 4 | 2007–2026 |
May v. Sommerfield
green
2 sentences2016May v Sommerfield, 239 Mich App 197, 202 ; 607 NW2d 422 (1999). [Churchman, 240 Mich App at 232 .] -4- Plaintiff argued that the report authored by Jennifer Zoltowski, M.S. created a factual dispute sufficient to present to a jury. 2016May v Sommerfield, 239 Mich App 197, 202 ; 607 NW2d 422 (1999). [Churchman, 240 Mich App at 232 .] -4- Plaintiff argued that the report authored by Jennifer Zoltowski, M.S. created a factual dispute sufficient to present to a jury. | 2 | 2000–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.