Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
General v. Blue Cross Blue Shieldgreen1 sentence2026See e.g., Attorney Gen v Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich, 291 Mich App 64, 75-76 ; 810 NW2d 603 (2010). 2 The parties treat the trial court’s October 2023 order as a dismissal of the default judgement and default. | 1 | 1 |
Midwest Energy Cooperative v. Public Service Commissiongreen2 sentences2020See Midwest Energy Co-op v Mich Pub Serv Comm, 268 Mich App 521, 523 ; 708 NW2d 147 (2005). 2020See Midwest Energy Co-op v Mich Pub Serv Comm, 268 Mich App 521, 523 ; 708 NW2d 147 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
Faircloth v. Family Independence Agencygreen2 sentences2015See Faircloth v Family Independence Agency, 232 Mich App 391, 400-401 ; 591 NW2d 314 (1998). 2015See Faircloth v Family Independence Agency, 232 Mich App 391, 400-401 ; 591 NW2d 314 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Albro v. Allen
green
2 sentences2018On appeal, plaintiff specifically challenges the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant on plaintiff’s claims for partition, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment. 3 Albro v Allen, 434 Mich 271 ; 454 NW2d 85 (1990). -5- II. 2018On appeal, plaintiff specifically challenges the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant on plaintiff’s claims for partition, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment. 3 Albro v Allen, 434 Mich 271 ; 454 NW2d 85 (1990). -5- II. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Acorn Investment Co v. Michigan Basic Property Insurance Assn
green
1 sentence2016Further, the stipulated order of dismissal entered by the trial court provided that the court retained jurisdiction pursuant to the arbitration agreement, but the order resolved “the last pending claim in this matter and closes the case.” Plaintiff argues that he was entitled to an award of case evaluation sanctions and cites Acorn Investment Co v Mich Basic Prop Ins Ass’n, 495 Mich 338 ; 852 NW2d 22 (2014), in support of his argument. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.