object of an ineffectiveness claim in Michigan

2020If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed. [Strickland, 466 US at 697 .] -5- Because defendant could not have been prejudiced by his trial counsel’s failure to object to the testimony, or by his trial counsel’s stipulation to defendant’s parolee status, he received the effective assistance of counsel at trial.

2020If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed. [Strickland, 466 US at 697 .] Because defendant was not prejudiced by his defense counsel’s failure to request a stay of proceedings on jurisdictional grounds, his trial attorney was not ineffective.

2019If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed.’ ” People v Reed, 449 Mich 375 , 400- 401; 535 NW2d 496 (1995), quoting Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 697 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984).

2019If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed.’ ” People v Reed, 449 Mich 375 , 400- 401; 535 NW2d 496 (1995), quoting Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 697 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984).

1995If it is easier to dispose of an ineffective ness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed. [Id. at 697.] To establish prejudice, "a criminal defendant . . . must show 'that counsel’s errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.’ Lockhart v Fretwell, 506 US 364, 369 ; 113 S Ct 838 ; 122 L Ed 2d 180 (1993), quoting Strickland, supra at 687 . 21 Defendant in this case received a fair trial and there are no circumstances that undermine confidence in the reliability

1995If it is easier to dispose of an ineffective ness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed. [Id. at 697.] To establish prejudice, "a criminal defendant . . . must show 'that counsel’s errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.’ Lockhart v Fretwell, 506 US 364, 369 ; 113 S Ct 838 ; 122 L Ed 2d 180 (1993), quoting Strickland, supra at 687 . 21 Defendant in this case received a fair trial and there are no circumstances that undermine confidence in the reliability

1995If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness *401 claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed. [ Id. at 697 .] To establish prejudice, "a criminal defendant ... must show `that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.'" Lockhart v Fretwell, 506 US 364, 369 ; 113 S Ct 838 ; 122 L Ed 2d 180 (1993), quoting Strickland, supra at 687 . [21] Defendant in this case received a fair trial and there are no circumstances that undermine confidence in the reli