partnership claim (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

partnership claim in Michigan

5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1932–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Morris Cruises v. Irwin Yacht & Marine Corp.green
michctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
2 sentences

1998See George Morris Cruises v Irwin Yacht & Marine Corp, 191 Mich App 409, 413-414 ; 478 NW2d 693 (1991).

1998See George Morris Cruises v Irwin Yacht & Marine Corp, 191 Mich App 409, 413-414 ; 478 NW2d 693 (1991).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Way v. Stebbins neutral
mich · 1882
2 sentences

1939Way v. Stebbins, 47 Mich. 296 .

1939Way v. Stebbins , 47 Mich. 296 .

21939–1939
Richards v. Tibaldi green
michctapp · 2007
1 sentence

2008Richards, supra at 539 .

12008–2008
Michigan National Bank v. Mudgett green
michctapp · 1989
2 sentences

1998Moreover, it is well established that individual shareholders generally cannot assert an individual claim arising from injury to the company, see Michigan Nat’l Bank v Mudgett, 178 Mich App 677, 679-680 ; 444 NW2d 534 (1989), and that individual partners can only assert a claim not independent of that of the partnership if the claim is brought in the name and on behalf of the partnership itself.

1998Moreover, it is well established that individual shareholders generally cannot assert an individual claim arising from injury to the company, see Michigan Nat’l Bank v Mudgett, 178 Mich App 677, 679-680 ; 444 NW2d 534 (1989), and that individual partners can only assert a claim not independent of that of the partnership if the claim is brought in the name and on behalf of the partnership itself.

11998–1998
Loomis v. Armstrong green
mich · 1883
1 sentence

1932The liability of an administrator in such cases has been stated: “In cases like the present, where a portion of the assets consisted of a partnership interest, he could only be properly charged with what he actually received or ought to have obtained from the survivor or from other sources.” Loomis v. Armstrong, 49 Mich. 521 .

11932–1932

Where else courts name it

CA 18 (1896–2024) TX 18 (1926–2024) NY 16 (1867–2018) IL 10 (1898–2025) LA 6 (1903–1985) MI 5 (1932–2008) GA 4 (1904–1977) SD 4 (1894–2023) FL 4 (1985–2013) MO 4 (1892–2010) UT 3 (1984–2008) NM 3 (1991–2009) IA 3 (1903–2024) OK 3 (1912–1956) PA 3 (1847–1984) MA 3 (1931–2003) NC 2 (1960–2016) AR 2 (1916–1923) WY 2 (1996–2019) SC 2 (1961–2008) OR 2 (1942–1993) MD 2 (1991–2011) ND 2 (1977–2005) CT 2 (1991–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check