Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Dillon
green
2 sentences2024“When a party asserts a facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute, the party must demonstrate that no circumstances exist under which the statute would be valid.” People v Dillon, 296 Mich App 506, 510 ; 822 NW2d 611 (2012). 2024“When a party asserts a facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute, the party must demonstrate that no circumstances exist under which the statute would be valid.” People v Dillon, 296 Mich App 506, 510 ; 822 NW2d 611 (2012). | 3 | 2023–2024 |
People v. Sands
green
2 sentences2016Id. at 160–161. -7- “The fact that a statute may appear undesirable, unfair, unjust, or inhumane does not of itself render a statute unconstitutional and empower a court to override the Legislature. 2012Id. at 160-161 . | 2 | 2012–2016 |
People v. Cole
green
2 sentences2024CRUEL OR UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT This Court has concluded that the Legislature “ ‘intended mandatory [LEM] to be an additional punishment and part of the sentence itself when required by the CSC-I or CSC-II statutes.’ ” People v Hallak, 310 Mich App 555, 571 ; 873 NW2d 811 (2015), overruled on other grounds 499 Mich 879 (2016), quoting People v Cole, 491 Mich 325, 335-336 ; 817 NW2d 497 (2012). 2024CRUEL OR UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT This Court has concluded that the Legislature “ ‘intended mandatory [LEM] to be an additional punishment and part of the sentence itself when required by the CSC-I or CSC-II statutes.’ ” People v Hallak, 310 Mich App 555, 571 ; 873 NW2d 811 (2015), overruled on other grounds 499 Mich 879 (2016), quoting People v Cole, 491 Mich 325, 335-336 ; 817 NW2d 497 (2012). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Robinson
green
1 sentence2024CRUEL OR UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT This Court has concluded that the Legislature “ ‘intended mandatory [LEM] to be an additional punishment and part of the sentence itself when required by the CSC-I or CSC-II statutes.’ ” People v Hallak, 310 Mich App 555, 571 ; 873 NW2d 811 (2015), overruled on other grounds 499 Mich 879 (2016), quoting People v Cole, 491 Mich 325, 335-336 ; 817 NW2d 497 (2012). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Konopka (On Remand)
green
2 sentences2024To preserve a challenge to court costs, the defendant must “object when the trial court ordered [the defendant] to pay costs and attorney fees.” People v Konopka (On Remand), 309 Mich App 345, 356 ; 869 NW2d 651 (2015). 2024To preserve a challenge to court costs, the defendant must “object when the trial court ordered [the defendant] to pay costs and attorney fees.” People v Konopka (On Remand), 309 Mich App 345, 356 ; 869 NW2d 651 (2015). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Hallak
green
2 sentences2024CRUEL OR UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT This Court has concluded that the Legislature “ ‘intended mandatory [LEM] to be an additional punishment and part of the sentence itself when required by the CSC-I or CSC-II statutes.’ ” People v Hallak, 310 Mich App 555, 571 ; 873 NW2d 811 (2015), overruled on other grounds 499 Mich 879 (2016), quoting People v Cole, 491 Mich 325, 335-336 ; 817 NW2d 497 (2012). 2024CRUEL OR UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT This Court has concluded that the Legislature “ ‘intended mandatory [LEM] to be an additional punishment and part of the sentence itself when required by the CSC-I or CSC-II statutes.’ ” People v Hallak, 310 Mich App 555, 571 ; 873 NW2d 811 (2015), overruled on other grounds 499 Mich 879 (2016), quoting People v Cole, 491 Mich 325, 335-336 ; 817 NW2d 497 (2012). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Bullock
green
2 sentences2023To determine whether a punishment is cruel or unusual, courts assess whether it is “unjustifiably disproportionate” to the offense committed by considering four factors: (1) the harshness of the penalty compared to the gravity of the offense, (2) the penalty imposed for the offense compared to penalties imposed for other offenses in Michigan, (3) the penalty imposed for the offense in Michigan compared to the penalty imposed for the same offense in other states, and (4) whether the penalty imposed advances the goal of rehabilitation. [People v Lymon, 342 Mich App 46 , 82; 993 NW2d 24 (2022), l 2023To determine whether a punishment is cruel or unusual, courts assess whether it is “unjustifiably disproportionate” to the offense committed by considering four factors: (1) the harshness of the penalty compared to the gravity of the offense, (2) the penalty imposed for the offense compared to penalties imposed for other offenses in Michigan, (3) the penalty imposed for the offense in Michigan compared to the penalty imposed for the same offense in other states, and (4) whether the penalty imposed advances the goal of rehabilitation. [People v Lymon, 342 Mich App 46 , 82; 993 NW2d 24 (2022), l | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.