Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
National Music Camp v. Green Lake Township
green
2 sentences1996This Court next considered, and rejected, the quantum of use test in Nat'l Music Camp v Green Lake Twp, 76 Mich App 608 ; 257 NW2d 188 (1977). 1996This Court next considered, and rejected, the quantum of use test in Nat'l Music Camp v Green Lake Twp, 76 Mich App 608 ; 257 NW2d 188 (1977). | 3 | 1981–1996 |
Lake Louise Christian Community v. Township of Hudson
green
2 sentences1996This Court first addressed the quantum of use test in Lake Louise Christian Community v Hudson Twp, 10 Mich App 573 ; 159 NW2d 849 (1968). 1996This Court first addressed the quantum of use test in Lake Louise Christian Community v Hudson Twp, 10 Mich App 573 ; 159 NW2d 849 (1968). | 3 | 1981–1996 |
Institute in Basic Life Principles, Inc. v. Watersmeet Township
green
2 sentences1996More recently, in Institute in Basic Life Principles, Inc v Watersmeet Twp (After Remand), 217 Mich App 7, 13 ; 551 NW2d 199 (1996), this Court adopted the criteria employed in Nat’l Music Camp and held that the quantum of use test should not be used to determine whether the property of a religious society qualifies for a tax exemption under the house of worship tax exemption statute. 1996More recently, in Institute in Basic Life Principles, Inc v Watersmeet Twp (After Remand), 217 Mich App 7, 13 ; 551 NW2d 199 (1996), this Court adopted the criteria employed in Nat’l Music Camp and held that the quantum of use test should not be used to determine whether the property of a religious society qualifies for a tax exemption under the house of worship tax exemption statute. | 2 | 1996–2024 |
Kalamazoo Nature Center, Inc v. Cooper Township
green
2 sentences1996Id. at 667 . *19 More recently, in McCormick Foundation, supra, the Court again declined to apply the quantum of use test, following Nat'l Music Camp, supra. The Court decided that the entire property was used in a manner that was consistent with the property owner’s charitable purposes. 1996Id. at 667 . *19 More recently, in McCormick Foundation, supra, the Court again declined to apply the quantum of use test, following Nat'l Music Camp, supra. The Court decided that the entire property was used in a manner that was consistent with the property owner’s charitable purposes. | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Webb Academy v. City of Grand Rapids
green
2 sentences1977We expressly hold that this quantum of use test does not apply to educational organizations within the scope of the statute. 2 The “substantial exclusion of all others” language is apparently derived from Webb Academy v Grand Rapids, 209 Mich 523 ; 177 NW 290 (1920). 1977We expressly hold that this quantum of use test does not apply to educational organizations within the scope of the statute. 2 The “substantial exclusion of all others” language is apparently derived from Webb Academy v Grand Rapids, 209 Mich 523 ; 177 NW 290 (1920). | 1 | 1977–1977 |