Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Minnesota opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Martha D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appelleegreen2 sentences2011See Danz, 263 N.W.2d at 403 n. 4 (citing Young v. Southwestern Savings & Loan Ass'n, 509 F.2d 140, 143 (5th Cir.1975)). 1991“An employer constructively discharges an employee only if it ‘makes an employee’s working conditions so intolerable that the employee is forced into an involuntary resignation.’ ” Bartman v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 799 F.2d 311, 314 (7th Cir.1986) (quoting Young v. Southwestern Savings & Loan Assoc., 509 F.2d 140, 144 (5th Cir.1975)). | 2 | 2 |
Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc.green1 sentence2024Grp., Inc., 794 N.W.2d 652, 662 (Minn. App. 2011) (“Neither the supreme court nor this court has applied the constructive discharge doctrine to a whistleblower claim.”), rev. denied (Minn. Apr. 19, 2011). | 1 | 1 |
Donahue v. Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A.green1 sentence2011Cf. Donahue v. Sehwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A., 586 N.W.2d 811, 816-17 (Minn.App.1998) (noting but not analyzing plaintiffs constructive discharge argument), review denied (Minn. Feb. 18, 1999), overruled on other grounds, Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women’s Ctr., Inc., 637 N.W.2d 270, 275-77 (Minn.2002). | 1 | 1 |
LeGalley v. Bronson Community Schoolsgreen2 sentences2011See Balmer, 604 N.W.2d at 641 ; Turner, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 223 , 876 P.2d at 1026 ; LeGalley v. Bronson Cmty. Schs., 127 Mich.App. 482 , 339 N.W.2d 223, 225 (1983). 2011See Balmer, 604 N.W.2d at 641 ; Turner, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 223 , 876 P.2d at 1026 ; LeGalley v. Bronson Cmty. Schs., 127 Mich.App. 482 , 339 N.W.2d 223, 225 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
Balmer v. Hawkeye Steelgreen1 sentence2011See Balmer, 604 N.W.2d at 641 ; Turner, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 223 , 876 P.2d at 1026 ; LeGalley v. Bronson Cmty. Schs., 127 Mich.App. 482 , 339 N.W.2d 223, 225 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
Danz v. Jonesgreen1 sentence2011See Danz, 263 N.W.2d at 403 n. 4 (citing Young v. Southwestern Savings & Loan Ass'n, 509 F.2d 140, 143 (5th Cir.1975)). | 1 | 1 |
Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's Center, Inc.green1 sentence2011Cf. Donahue v. Sehwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A., 586 N.W.2d 811, 816-17 (Minn.App.1998) (noting but not analyzing plaintiffs constructive discharge argument), review denied (Minn. Feb. 18, 1999), overruled on other grounds, Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women’s Ctr., Inc., 637 N.W.2d 270, 275-77 (Minn.2002). | 1 | 1 |
Less v. Nestle Co., Inc.green2 sentences1992In Less v. Nestle Co. Inc., 705 F.Supp. 110, 114 (W.D.N.Y.1988), the court precluded an employee’s constructive discharge claim at trial when the administrative charge had only alleged age discrimination. 3 Absent any notice that defendant was being charged with [coercing an employee to retire], the [department of human rights] would not be expected to independently uncover facts showing that defendant unlawfully coerced plaintiff into taking early retirement when the investigation focused on facts constituting discrimination. 1992Id. | 1 | 1 |
cluster 475280green1 sentence1991“An employer constructively discharges an employee only if it ‘makes an employee’s working conditions so intolerable that the employee is forced into an involuntary resignation.’ ” Bartman v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 799 F.2d 311, 314 (7th Cir.1986) (quoting Young v. Southwestern Savings & Loan Assoc., 509 F.2d 140, 144 (5th Cir.1975)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011See Balmer, 604 N.W.2d at 641 ; Turner, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 223 , 876 P.2d at 1026 ; LeGalley v. Bronson Cmty. Schs., 127 Mich.App. 482 , 339 N.W.2d 223, 225 (1983). 2011See Balmer, 604 N.W.2d at 641 ; Turner, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 223 , 876 P.2d at 1026 ; LeGalley v. Bronson Cmty. Schs., 127 Mich.App. 482 , 339 N.W.2d 223, 225 (1983). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
cluster 477995
green
1 sentence1995Id. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.