end of any judicial inquiry (Nebraska) · Go Syfert
← Nebraska issues

end of any judicial inquiry in Nebraska

41 Nebraska opinions name it 3 courts 2000–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Hobza v. Seedorff Masonry, Inc.red
neb · 2000 · cited in 2 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2000–2004
2 sentences

2004“If the language of a statute is clear, the words of such statute are the end of any judicial inquiry regarding its meaning.” Hobza v. Seedorff Masonry, Inc., 259 Neb. 671, 675 , 611 N.W.2d 828, 831 (2000).

2004“If the language of a statute is clear, the words of such statute are the end of any judicial inquiry regarding its meaning.” Hobza v. Seedorff Masonry, Inc., 259 Neb. 671, 675 , 611 N.W.2d 828, 831 (2000).

12
Stewart v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev.green
neb · 2016 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018See Stewart v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev., 294 Neb. 1010 , 885 N.W.2d 723 (2016).

2018See Stewart v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev., 294 Neb. 1010 , 885 N.W.2d 723 (2016).

11
Zavala v. ConAgra Beef Co.green
neb · 2003 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004“The Legislature enacted the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Act ... in order to relieve injured workers from the adverse economic effects caused by a work-related injury or occupational disease.” Zavala v. ConAgra Beef Co., 265 Neb. at 197 , 655 N.W.2d at 700 (2003).

2004“The Legislature enacted the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Act ... in order to relieve injured workers from the adverse economic effects caused by a work-related injury or occupational disease.” Zavala v. ConAgra Beef Co., 265 Neb. at 197 , 655 N.W.2d at 700 (2003).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (23)

CaseCitedYears
Ameritas Life Ins. Corp. v. Balka green
neb · 1999
2 sentences

2000Ameritas Life Ins. v. Balka, 257 Neb. 878 , 601 N.W.2d 508 (1999).

2000Ameritas Life Ins. v. Balka, 257 Neb. 878 , 601 N.W.2d 508 (1999).

52000–2000
Turco v. Schuning green
neb · 2006
2 sentences

2008Turco v. Schuning, 271 Neb. 770 , 716 N.W.2d 415 (2006).

2008Turco v. Schuning, 271 Neb. 770 , 716 N.W.2d 415 (2006).

42007–2008
First Data Corp. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REV. green
neb · 2002
2 sentences

2004First Data Corp. v. State, 263 Neb. 344 , 639 N.W.2d 898 (2002).

2004First Data Corp. v. State, 263 Neb. 344 , 639 N.W.2d 898 (2002).

42002–2004
Guardianship of Garcia v. Garcia green
neb · 2001
2 sentences

2002In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Garcia, 262 Neb. 205 , 631 N.W.2d 464 (2001); Mulinix v. Roberts, 261 Neb. 800 , 626 N.W.2d 220 (2001).

2002In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Garcia, 262 Neb. 205 , 631 N.W.2d 464 (2001); Mulinix v. Roberts, 261 Neb. 800 , 626 N.W.2d 220 (2001).

32001–2002
County of Lancaster v. County of Custer green
neb · 2023
2 sentences

2023Id.

2023COUNTY OF CUSTER Cite as 313 Neb. 622 province of a court to read a meaning into a statute that is not warranted by the language; neither is it within the prov- ince of a court to read anything plain, direct, or unambiguous out of a statute. 30 If the language of a statute is clear, the words of such statute are the end of any judicial inquiry regarding its meaning. 31 (d) Specific Statute Versus General Statute [12] To the extent conflict exists between two statutes, the specific statute controls over the general. 32 During oral argu- ment, the parties took different positions regarding which

22023–2023
State v. Bossow green
neb · 2008
2 sentences

2014State v. Bossow, 274 Neb. 836 , 744 N.W.2d 43 (2008).

2014State v. Bossow, 274 Neb. 836 , 744 N.W.2d 43 (2008).

22014–2014
State v. Rhea green
neb · 2001
2 sentences

2008State v. Rhea, 262 Neb. 886 , 636 N.W.2d 364 (2001).

2008State v. Rhea, 262 Neb. 886 , 636 N.W.2d 364 (2001).

22003–2008
McCray v. Nebraska State Patrol green
neb · 2006
2 sentences

2007Turco v. Schuning, 271 Neb. 770 , 716 N.W.2d 415 (2006); McCray v. Nebraska State Patrol, 271 Neb. 1 , 710 N.W.2d 300 (2006).

2007Turco v. Schuning, 271 Neb. 770 , 716 N.W.2d 415 (2006); McCray v. Nebraska State Patrol, 271 Neb. 1 , 710 N.W.2d 300 (2006).

22006–2007
Mogensen v. Board of Supervisors red
neb · 2004
2 sentences

2006The problem with this argument is that "[i]f the language of a statute is clear, the words of such statute are the end of any judicial inquiry regarding its meaning." Morgensen v. Board of Supervisors, 268 Neb. 26 , 30 , 679 N.W.2d 413 , 417 (2004).

2006The problem with this argument is that "[i]f the language of a statute is clear, the words of such statute are the end of any judicial inquiry regarding its meaning." Morgensen v. Board of Supervisors, 268 Neb. 26 , 30 , 679 N.W.2d 413 , 417 (2004).

22006–2006
Gracey v. Zwonechek green
neb · 2002
2 sentences

2003Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 264 Neb. 582 , 650 N.W.2d 744 (2002); Gracey v. Zwonechek, 263 Neb. 796 , 643 N.W.2d 381 (2002); City of Omaha v. Kum & Go, 263 Neb. 724 , 642 N.W.2d 154 (2002).

2003Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 264 Neb. 582 , 650 N.W.2d 744 (2002); Gracey v. Zwonechek, 263 Neb. 796 , 643 N.W.2d 381 (2002); City of Omaha v. Kum & Go, 263 Neb. 724 , 642 N.W.2d 154 (2002).

22002–2003
Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. green
neb · 2002
2 sentences

2003Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 264 Neb. 582 , 650 N.W.2d 744 (2002); Gracey v. Zwonechek, 263 Neb. 796 , 643 N.W.2d 381 (2002); City of Omaha v. Kum & Go, 263 Neb. 724 , 642 N.W.2d 154 (2002).

2003Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 264 Neb. 582 , 650 N.W.2d 744 (2002); Gracey v. Zwonechek, 263 Neb. 796 , 643 N.W.2d 381 (2002); City of Omaha v. Kum & Go, 263 Neb. 724 , 642 N.W.2d 154 (2002).

22003–2003
Mulinix v. Roberts neutral
neb · 2001
2 sentences

2002In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Garcia, 262 Neb. 205 , 631 N.W.2d 464 (2001); Mulinix v. Roberts, 261 Neb. 800 , 626 N.W.2d 220 (2001).

2002In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Garcia, 262 Neb. 205 , 631 N.W.2d 464 (2001); Mulinix v. Roberts, 261 Neb. 800 , 626 N.W.2d 220 (2001).

22001–2002
Vopalka v. Abraham green
neb · 2000
2 sentences

2001Vopalka v. Abraham, 260 Neb. 737 , 619 N.W.2d 594 (2000).

2001Vopalka v. Abraham, 260 Neb. 737 , 619 N.W.2d 594 (2000).

22001–2001
Schrader v. Farmers Mutual Insurance green
neb · 2000
2 sentences

2000Id.

2000Co., ante p. 87, 608 N.W.2d 194 (2000); Lyman-Richey Corp. v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev., supra. If the language of a statute is clear, the words of such statute are the end of any judicial inquiry regarding its meaning.

22000–2000
Sharkey v. Board of Regents green
neb · 2000
2 sentences

2000American Employers Group v. Department of Labor, ante p. 405, 617 N.W.2d 808 (2000); Sharkey v. Board of Regents, ante p. 166, 615 N.W.2d 889 (2000).

2000Sharkey v. Board of Regents, ante p. 166, 615 N.W.2d 889 (2000).

22000–2000
State v. Mastne neutral
nebctapp · 2006
1 sentence

2009Id. statutory language is to be given its plain and ordinary meaning, and an appellate court will not resort to interpretation to ascertain the meaning of statutory words which are plain, direct, and unambiguous.

12009–2009
State v. Warriner neutral
neb · 2004
2 sentences

2006State v. Warriner, 267 Neb. 424 , 675 N.W.2d 112 (2004); American Employers Group v. Department of Labor , *10 supra. Statutory language is to be given its plain and ordinary meaning, and an appellate court will not resort to interpretation to ascertain the meaning of statutory words which are plain, direct, and unambiguous.

2006State v. Warriner, 267 Neb. 424 , 675 N.W.2d 112 (2004); American Employers Group v. Department of Labor , *10 supra. Statutory language is to be given its plain and ordinary meaning, and an appellate court will not resort to interpretation to ascertain the meaning of statutory words which are plain, direct, and unambiguous.

12006–2006
Salazar v. Scotts Bluff County green
neb · 2003
2 sentences

2004Salazar v. Scotts Bluff Cty., 266 Neb. 444 , 665 N.W.2d 659 (2003).

2004Salazar v. Scotts Bluff Cty., 266 Neb. 444 , 665 N.W.2d 659 (2003).

12004–2004
State v. Jones green
neb · 2000
2 sentences

2004State v. Jones, 258 Neb. 695 , 605 N.W.2d 434 (2000).

2004State v. Jones, 258 Neb. 695 , 605 N.W.2d 434 (2000).

12004–2004
City of Omaha v. Kum & Go, L.L.C. green
neb · 2002
2 sentences

2003Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 264 Neb. 582 , 650 N.W.2d 744 (2002); Gracey v. Zwonechek, 263 Neb. 796 , 643 N.W.2d 381 (2002); City of Omaha v. Kum & Go, 263 Neb. 724 , 642 N.W.2d 154 (2002).

2003Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 264 Neb. 582 , 650 N.W.2d 744 (2002); Gracey v. Zwonechek, 263 Neb. 796 , 643 N.W.2d 381 (2002); City of Omaha v. Kum & Go, 263 Neb. 724 , 642 N.W.2d 154 (2002).

12003–2003
GUENZEL HANDLOS v. County of Lancaster green
neb · 2003
2 sentences

2003Guenzel-Handlos v. County of Lancaster, 265 Neb. 125 , 655 N.W.2d 384 (2003); Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 264 Neb. 582 , 650 N.W.2d 744 (2002).

2003Guenzel-Handlos v. County of Lancaster, 265 Neb. 125 , 655 N.W.2d 384 (2003); Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 264 Neb. 582 , 650 N.W.2d 744 (2002).

12003–2003
Big John's Billiards, Inc. v. Balka green
neb · 2000
2 sentences

2001Vopalka v. Abraham, 260 Neb. 737 , 619 N.W.2d 594 (2000); Big John’s Billiards v. Balka, 260 Neb. 702 , 619 N.W.2d 444 (2000).

2001Vopalka v. Abraham, 260 Neb. 737 , 619 N.W.2d 594 (2000); Big John’s Billiards v. Balka, 260 Neb. 702 , 619 N.W.2d 444 (2000).

12001–2001
American Employers Group, Inc. v. Department of Labor green
neb · 2000
1 sentence

2000American Employers Group v. Department of Labor, ante p. 405, 617 N.W.2d 808 (2000); Sharkey v. Board of Regents, ante p. 166, 615 N.W.2d 889 (2000).

12000–2000

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106 (7) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-121 (4) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-917 (4) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-105 (3) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-125 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check