Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
John Dean Wennihan v. Beth Ann Wennihangreen2 sentences2023“The failure to account for such holidays in the parenting plan constitutes reversible error.” Taylor, 620 S.W.3d at 312 (quoting Wennihan, 452 S.W.3d at 737 ); Olson v. Olson, 559 S.W.3d 395, 399 (Mo. App. S.D. 2018); In re Marriage of Murphey, 207 S.W.3d at 686 . 4 Because the Amended Parenting Plan did not address custody for Martin Luther King Day or Presidents’ Day as statutorily required, we must find the trial court plainly erred. 2021“The failure to account for such holidays in the parenting plan constitutes reversible error.” Wennihan, 452 S.W.3d at 737 . | 1 | 4 |
In Re Marriage of Murpheygreen2 sentences2023“The failure to account for such holidays in the parenting plan constitutes reversible error.” Taylor, 620 S.W.3d at 312 (quoting Wennihan, 452 S.W.3d at 737 ); Olson v. Olson, 559 S.W.3d 395, 399 (Mo. App. S.D. 2018); In re Marriage of Murphey, 207 S.W.3d at 686 . 4 Because the Amended Parenting Plan did not address custody for Martin Luther King Day or Presidents’ Day as statutorily required, we must find the trial court plainly erred. 2018See, e.g. , Wennihan v. Wennihan , 452 S.W.3d 723 , 737 (Mo. App. 2015) (reversal required because parenting plan failed to address Presidents' Day and Martin Luther King Jr. Day); Murphey , 207 S.W.3d 679 , 686 (same holding as Wennihan with the addition of Memorial Day and Labor Day as holidays also omitted from parenting plan). | 1 | 3 |
Olson v. Olsongreen1 sentence2023“The failure to account for such holidays in the parenting plan constitutes reversible error.” Taylor, 620 S.W.3d at 312 (quoting Wennihan, 452 S.W.3d at 737 ); Olson v. Olson, 559 S.W.3d 395, 399 (Mo. App. S.D. 2018); In re Marriage of Murphey, 207 S.W.3d at 686 . 4 Because the Amended Parenting Plan did not address custody for Martin Luther King Day or Presidents’ Day as statutorily required, we must find the trial court plainly erred. | 1 | 1 |
D.M.K. v. Muellergreen1 sentence2015Murphey v. Murphey, 207 S.W.3d 679, 686 (Mo.App.S.D.2006); see also D.M.K. v. Mueller, 152 S.W.3d 922, 930 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.