Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2013“Post-conviction proceedings are for the purpose of bringing to the trial court’s attention facts not known at the time of judgment.” Williams v. State, 669 So.2d 44, 52 (Miss.1996) (citing Smith v. State, 477 So.2d 191 (Miss.1985)). 2010“Post-conviction proceedings are for the purpose of bringing to the trial court’s attention facts not known at the time of judgment.” Williams v. State, 669 So. 2d 44, 52 (Miss. 1996) (citing Smith v. State, 477 So. 2d 191 (Miss. 1985)). | 2 | 2 |
Burns v. Stategreen2 sentences2009The State relies on Burns v. State, 729 So.2d 203, 219 (Miss.1998), which states "an objection at trial cannot be enlarged in a reviewing court to embrace an omission not complained of at trial." ¶ 20. 2009The State relies on Bums v. State, 729 So.2d 203, 219 (Miss.1998), which states “an objection at trial cannot be enlarged in a reviewing court to embrace an omission not complained of at trial.” ¶ 20. | 2 | 2 |
Roach v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Id. at 135 (¶30). ¶44. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. State
green
2 sentences2013“Post-conviction proceedings are for the purpose of bringing to the trial court’s attention facts not known at the time of judgment.” Williams v. State, 669 So.2d 44, 52 (Miss.1996) (citing Smith v. State, 477 So.2d 191 (Miss.1985)). 2010“Post-conviction proceedings are for the purpose of bringing to the trial court’s attention facts not known at the time of judgment.” Williams v. State, 669 So. 2d 44, 52 (Miss. 1996) (citing Smith v. State, 477 So. 2d 191 (Miss. 1985)). | 2 | 2010–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.