employer has accepted claim (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

employer has accepted claim in North Carolina

5 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Yingling v. Bank of Americagreen
ncctapp · 2013 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020As to the argument Defendants were prejudiced by being unable to direct medical care, we have “long held that the right to direct medical treatment is triggered only when the employer has accepted the claim as compensable.” Yingling v. Bank of Am., 225 N.C.

2020As to the argument Defendants were prejudiced by being unable to direct medical care, we have “long held that the right to direct medical treatment is triggered only when the employer has accepted the claim as compensable.” Yingling v. Bank of Am., 225 N.C.

22
Kanipe v. Lane Upholsterygreen
ncctapp · 2000 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2002–2013
2 sentences

2013Moreover, this Court has long held that “the right to direct medical treatment is triggered only when the employer has accepted the claim as compensable.” Id. at 624 , 540 S.E.2d at 788 .

2002Further, this finding by the Industrial Commission supports its conclusion that “[defendants, having failed to admit liability for plaintiff’s claim, did not obtain the right to direct plaintiff’s medical treatment.” “[T]he right to direct medical treatment is triggered only when the employer has accepted the claim as compensable.” Kanipe v. Lane Upholstery, 141 N.C.

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Craven v. VF Corp. green
ncctapp · 2004
1 sentence

2013Craven v. VF Corp., 167 N.C.

12013–2013

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NC 5 (2002–2020) OR 3 (1984–1986)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check