interrelated factors (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

interrelated factors in North Carolina

5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1975–1993 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Barker v. Wingo green
scotus · 1972
2 sentences

1975However, where, as here, there has been an unexplained delay and a substantial showing that the delay may have impaired defendant’s ability to present a defense, the trial judge should hold a sufficient hearing to permit him to determine the facts and to apply the balancing test referred to in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 (1972), taking into account the interrelated factors referred to in that case and in State v. Brown, supra. This should have been done in the present case.

1975However, where, as here, there has been an unexplained delay and a substantial showing that the delay may have impaired defendant’s ability to present a defense, the trial judge should hold a sufficient hearing to permit him to determine the facts and to apply the balancing test referred to in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 (1972), taking into account the interrelated factors referred to in that case and in State v. Brown, supra. This should have been done in the present case.

41975–1993
State v. Smith green
nc · 1976
2 sentences

1984We said in Smith that the following interrelated factors were to be considered in determining whether a defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial: “(1) length of delay; (2) reason for the delay; (3) defendant’s assertion of his right to a speedy trial; and (4) prejudice to the defendant resulting from the delay.” Id. at 148 , 221 S.E. 2d at 250 .

1984We said in Smith that the following interrelated factors were to be considered in determining whether a defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial: “(1) length of delay; (2) reason for the delay; (3) defendant’s assertion of his right to a speedy trial; and (4) prejudice to the defendant resulting from the delay.” Id. at 148 , 221 S.E. 2d at 250 .

21981–1984
State v. McKoy green
nc · 1978
2 sentences

1981Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972); State v. McKoy, 294 N.C. 134 , 240 S.E. 2d 383 (1978); State v. Wright, supra; State v. Smith, 289 N.C. 143 , 221 S.E. 2d 247 (1976).

1981Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972); State v. McKoy, 294 N.C. 134 , 240 S.E. 2d 383 (1978); State v. Wright, supra; State v. Smith, 289 N.C. 143 , 221 S.E. 2d 247 (1976).

11981–1981
State v. Harrell green
nc · 1972
2 sentences

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

11976–1976
State v. Gordon green
nc · 1975
2 sentences

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

11976–1976
State v. Brown green
nc · 1972
2 sentences

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

11976–1976
State v. Frank green
nc · 1973
2 sentences

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

11976–1976
State v. O'KELLY green
nc · 1974
2 sentences

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

11976–1976
State v. Hill green
nc · 1975
2 sentences

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

11976–1976
State v. Johnson green
nc · 1969
2 sentences

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

1976Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972); State v. Hill, 287 N.C. 207 , 214 S.E. 2d 67 (1975); State v. Gordon, 287 N.C. 118 , 213 S.E. 2d 708 (1975); State v. O’Kelly, 285 N.C. 368 , 204 S.E. 2d 672 (1974); State v. Frank, 284 N.C. 137 , 200 S.E. 2d 169 (1973); State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972); State v. Harrell, 281 N.C. 111 , 187 S.E. 2d 789 (1972); State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969).

11976–1976

Where else courts name it

CA 11 (1990–2023) NC 5 (1975–1993) MD 4 (1975–2019) NY 3 (1998–2012) IL 3 (1991–1996) WV 2 (2025–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check