Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hayes v. . Elon Collegegreen2 sentences2004Hayes v. Eton College, 224 N.C. 11, 15 , 29 S.E.2d 137, 140-41 (1944); see also Harmon v. Contracting Co., 159 N.C. 22, 27-28 , 74 S.E. 632, 634 (1912); Scott v. Lumber Co., 232 N.C. 162, 165 , 59 S.E.2d 425, 426-27 (1950). 2004Hayes v. Eton College, 224 N.C. 11, 15 , 29 S.E.2d 137, 140-41 (1944); see also Harmon v. Contracting Co., 159 N.C. 22, 27-28 , 74 S.E. 632, 634 (1912); Scott v. Lumber Co., 232 N.C. 162, 165 , 59 S.E.2d 425, 426-27 (1950). | 1 | 3 |
Harmon v. Ferguson Contracting Co.green2 sentences2004Hayes v. Eton College, 224 N.C. 11, 15 , 29 S.E.2d 137, 140-41 (1944); see also Harmon v. Contracting Co., 159 N.C. 22, 27-28 , 74 S.E. 632, 634 (1912); Scott v. Lumber Co., 232 N.C. 162, 165 , 59 S.E.2d 425, 426-27 (1950). 2004Hayes v. Eton College, 224 N.C. 11, 15 , 29 S.E.2d 137, 140-41 (1944); see also Harmon v. Contracting Co., 159 N.C. 22, 27-28 , 74 S.E. 632, 634 (1912); Scott v. Lumber Co., 232 N.C. 162, 165 , 59 S.E.2d 425, 426-27 (1950). | 1 | 3 |
Scott v. Waccamaw Lumber Co.green2 sentences2004Hayes v. Eton College, 224 N.C. 11, 15 , 29 S.E.2d 137, 140-41 (1944); see also Harmon v. Contracting Co., 159 N.C. 22, 27-28 , 74 S.E. 632, 634 (1912); Scott v. Lumber Co., 232 N.C. 162, 165 , 59 S.E.2d 425, 426-27 (1950). 2004Hayes v. Eton College, 224 N.C. 11, 15 , 29 S.E.2d 137, 140-41 (1944); see also Harmon v. Contracting Co., 159 N.C. 22, 27-28 , 74 S.E. 632, 634 (1912); Scott v. Lumber Co., 232 N.C. 162, 165 , 59 S.E.2d 425, 426-27 (1950). | 1 | 2 |
Wood v. McDonald's Corp.green2 sentences2007“Whenever the principal retains the right ‘to control and direct the manner in which the details of the work are to be executed’ by his agent, the doctrine of respondeat superior operates to make the principal vicariously liable for the tortious acts committed by the agent *338 within the scope of their employment.” Id. at 57-58 , 603 S.E.2d at 546 (citation omitted). 2007“Whenever the principal retains the right ‘to control and direct the manner in which the details of the work are to be executed’ by his agent, the doctrine of respondeat superior operates to make the principal vicariously liable for the tortious acts committed by the agent *338 within the scope of their employment.” Id. at 57-58 , 603 S.E.2d at 546 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human Resourcesgreen2 sentences1984Vaughn v. Dept. of Human Resources, 296 N.C. 683, 686 , 252 S.E. 2d 792, 795 (1979). 1984Vaughn v. Dept. of Human Resources, 296 N.C. 683, 686 , 252 S.E. 2d 792, 795 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.