respondent of a fair hearing (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

respondent of a fair hearing in North Carolina

5 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re JAAgreen
ncctapp · 2005 · cited in 4 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2007–2010
2 sentences

2010In In re Dj.L ., this Court stated that: This Court has previously determined that alleged deficiencies did not deprive the respondent of a fair hearing when the respondent's counsel `vigorously and zealously represented' her, was familiar `with her ability to aid in her own defense, as well as the idiosyncrasies of her personality,' and `the record contain[ed] overwhelming evidence supporting termination[.]' In re Dj.L., D.L., S.L., 184 N.C.App. at 86 , 646 S.E.2d at 141 (quoting In re J.A.A. & S.A.A., 175 N.C.App. at 74 , 623 S.E.2d at 50 ).

2008In In re Dj.L., this Court stated that: This Court has previously determined that alleged deficiencies did not deprive the respondent of a fair hearing when the respondent's counsel "vigorously and zealously represented" her, was familiar "with her ability to aid in her own defense, as well as the idiosyncrasies of her personality," and "the record contain[ed] overwhelming evidence supporting termination[.]" In re Dj.L., D.L., S.L., 184 N.C.App. at 86 , 646 S.E.2d at 141 (quoting In re J.A.A. & S.A.A., 175 N.C.App. at 74 , 623 S.E.2d at 50 ).

14

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
In re J.A.A. green
ncctapp · 2005
2 sentences

2010In In re Dj.L ., this Court stated that: This Court has previously determined that alleged deficiencies did not deprive the respondent of a fair hearing when the respondent's counsel `vigorously and zealously represented' her, was familiar `with her ability to aid in her own defense, as well as the idiosyncrasies of her personality,' and `the record contain[ed] overwhelming evidence supporting termination[.]' In re Dj.L., D.L., S.L., 184 N.C.App. at 86 , 646 S.E.2d at 141 (quoting In re J.A.A. & S.A.A., 175 N.C.App. at 74 , 623 S.E.2d at 50 ).

2008In In re Dj.L., this Court stated that: This Court has previously determined that alleged deficiencies did not deprive the respondent of a fair hearing when the respondent's counsel "vigorously and zealously represented" her, was familiar "with her ability to aid in her own defense, as well as the idiosyncrasies of her personality," and "the record contain[ed] overwhelming evidence supporting termination[.]" In re Dj.L., D.L., S.L., 184 N.C.App. at 86 , 646 S.E.2d at 141 (quoting In re J.A.A. & S.A.A., 175 N.C.App. at 74 , 623 S.E.2d at 50 ).

52007–2010
In Re Dj. L. green
ncctapp · 2007
2 sentences

2010In In re Dj.L., this Court stated that: This Court has previously determined that alleged deficiencies did not deprive the respondent of a fair hearing when the respondent’s counsel ‘vigorously and zealously represented’ her, was familiar ‘with her ability to aid in her own defense, as well as the idiosyncrasies of her personality,’ and ‘the record contained] overwhelming evidence supporting termination^ ]’ In re Dj.L., D.L., S.L., 184 N.C.

2010In In re Dj.L ., this Court stated that: This Court has previously determined that alleged deficiencies did not deprive the respondent of a fair hearing when the respondent's counsel `vigorously and zealously represented' her, was familiar `with her ability to aid in her own defense, as well as the idiosyncrasies of her personality,' and `the record contain[ed] overwhelming evidence supporting termination[.]' In re Dj.L., D.L., S.L., 184 N.C.App. at 86 , 646 S.E.2d at 141 (quoting In re J.A.A. & S.A.A., 175 N.C.App. at 74 , 623 S.E.2d at 50 ).

42008–2010

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-101 (5) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1101.1 (5) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111 (5) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NC 5 (2007–2010) IL 3 (2022–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check