Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rose v. Vulcan Materials Companygreen2 sentences2022See Rose v. Vulcan Materials Co., 282 N.C. 643, 656-57 , 194 S.E.2d 521, 530-31 (1973) (consulting federal decisions to inform the court’s restraint-of- trade analysis). 2022See Rose v. Vulcan Materials Co., 282 N.C. 643, 656-57 , 194 S.E.2d 521, 530-31 (1973) (consulting federal decisions to inform the court’s restraint-of- trade analysis). | 3 | 3 |
No. 01-2458green2 sentences2019See DiCesare, 2017 NCBC LEXIS 33 , at *48 (quoting Dickson, 309 F.3d at 206 ). 2017The elements of a restraint of trade claim are: “(1) a contract, combination, or conspiracy; (2) that imposed an unreasonable restraint of trade.” Dickson v. Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002). | 2 | 2 |
Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospitalgreen1 sentence2019See Oksanen v. Page Mem’l Hosp., 945 F.2d 696 , 711 (4th Cir. 1991) (“The antitrust laws were not intended . . . as a vehicle for converting business tort claims into antitrust causes of action.”). 68. | 1 | 1 |
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Philip Morris Inc.green1 sentence2019Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Philip Morris, Inc., 199 F. Supp. 2d 362, 380 (M.D.N.C. 2002) (quotation marks omitted). 66. | 1 | 1 |
Valley Liquors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.green1 sentence2017Murrow Furniture Galleries, Inc. v. Thomasville Furniture Indus., Inc., 889 F.2d 524 , 528 (4th Cir. 1989) (quoting Valley Liquors v. Renfield Imps., 822 F.2d 656, 666 (7th Cir. 1987)). 135. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority
green
1 sentence2022Auth., 248 F. Supp. 3d 720 (W.D.N.C. 2017) (“Atrium”). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Murrow Furniture Galleries, Inc. v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.
green
1 sentence2017Murrow Furniture Galleries, Inc. v. Thomasville Furniture Indus., Inc., 889 F.2d 524 , 528 (4th Cir. 1989) (quoting Valley Liquors v. Renfield Imps., 822 F.2d 656, 666 (7th Cir. 1987)). 135. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.