Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Buckmangreen2 sentences2021The district court ultimately denied Jacob’s motion 4 State v. Buckman, 267 Neb. 505, 515 , 675 N.W.2d 372, 381 (2004). 5 State v. Myers, 304 Neb. 789 , 937 N.W.2d 181 (2020). 6 State v. Dean, 270 Neb. 972 , 708 N.W.2d 640 (2006). 7 State v. Lotter, 266 Neb. 758 , 669 N.W.2d 438 (2003). - 408 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 309 Neb. 401 for DNA testing and granted the State’s motion to deny DNA testing. 2021The district court ultimately denied Jacob’s motion 4 State v. Buckman, 267 Neb. 505, 515 , 675 N.W.2d 372, 381 (2004). 5 State v. Myers, 304 Neb. 789 , 937 N.W.2d 181 (2020). 6 State v. Dean, 270 Neb. 972 , 708 N.W.2d 640 (2006). 7 State v. Lotter, 266 Neb. 758 , 669 N.W.2d 438 (2003). - 408 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 309 Neb. 401 for DNA testing and granted the State’s motion to deny DNA testing. | 1 | 1 |
Graham v. Simplex Motor Rebuilders, Inc.green2 sentences1998See Graham v. Simplex Motor Rebuilders, 191 Neb. 320 , 215 N.W.2d 641 (1974). 1998See Graham v. Simplex Motor Rebuilders, 191 Neb. 320 , 215 N.W.2d 641 (1974). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jacob
green
2 sentences2021We find no substantive merit to Jacob’s motion and overrule it, but modify the opinion as follows: In the background section, under the subheading “Motion for DNA Testing,” we withdraw the last sentence of the first paragraph, id. at 405 , 960 N.W.2d at 331 , and substitute the following: Jacob argued that with current methods of retrieving DNA from shell casings, the DNA on the shell casings - 158 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 310 Neb. 157 could “identify who took and loaded the firearm from [his] office” and is exculpatory because it “sho 2021The district court ultimately denied Jacob’s motion 4 State v. Buckman, 267 Neb. 505, 515 , 675 N.W.2d 372, 381 (2004). 5 State v. Myers, 304 Neb. 789 , 937 N.W.2d 181 (2020). 6 State v. Dean, 270 Neb. 972 , 708 N.W.2d 640 (2006). 7 State v. Lotter, 266 Neb. 758 , 669 N.W.2d 438 (2003). - 408 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 309 Neb. 401 for DNA testing and granted the State’s motion to deny DNA testing. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Anders
green
2 sentences2022Affirmed. 50 State v. Anders, 311 Neb. 958 , 977 N.W.2d 234 (2022). 2022Affirmed. 50 State v. Anders, 311 Neb. 958 , 977 N.W.2d 234 (2022). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Dean
green
2 sentences2021The district court ultimately denied Jacob’s motion 4 State v. Buckman, 267 Neb. 505, 515 , 675 N.W.2d 372, 381 (2004). 5 State v. Myers, 304 Neb. 789 , 937 N.W.2d 181 (2020). 6 State v. Dean, 270 Neb. 972 , 708 N.W.2d 640 (2006). 7 State v. Lotter, 266 Neb. 758 , 669 N.W.2d 438 (2003). - 408 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 309 Neb. 401 for DNA testing and granted the State’s motion to deny DNA testing. 2021The district court ultimately denied Jacob’s motion 4 State v. Buckman, 267 Neb. 505, 515 , 675 N.W.2d 372, 381 (2004). 5 State v. Myers, 304 Neb. 789 , 937 N.W.2d 181 (2020). 6 State v. Dean, 270 Neb. 972 , 708 N.W.2d 640 (2006). 7 State v. Lotter, 266 Neb. 758 , 669 N.W.2d 438 (2003). - 408 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 309 Neb. 401 for DNA testing and granted the State’s motion to deny DNA testing. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Jacob - supplemental opinion
green
2 sentences2021We find no substantive merit to Jacob’s motion and overrule it, but modify the opinion as follows: In the background section, under the subheading “Motion for DNA Testing,” we withdraw the last sentence of the first paragraph, id. at 405 , 960 N.W.2d at 331 , and substitute the following: Jacob argued that with current methods of retrieving DNA from shell casings, the DNA on the shell casings - 158 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 310 Neb. 157 could “identify who took and loaded the firearm from [his] office” and is exculpatory because it “sho 2021We find no substantive merit to Jacob’s motion and overrule it, but modify the opinion as follows: In the background section, under the subheading “Motion for DNA Testing,” we withdraw the last sentence of the first paragraph, id. at 405 , 960 N.W.2d at 331 , and substitute the following: Jacob argued that with current methods of retrieving DNA from shell casings, the DNA on the shell casings - 158 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 310 Neb. 157 could “identify who took and loaded the firearm from [his] office” and is exculpatory because it “sho | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Lotter
green
2 sentences2021The district court ultimately denied Jacob’s motion 4 State v. Buckman, 267 Neb. 505, 515 , 675 N.W.2d 372, 381 (2004). 5 State v. Myers, 304 Neb. 789 , 937 N.W.2d 181 (2020). 6 State v. Dean, 270 Neb. 972 , 708 N.W.2d 640 (2006). 7 State v. Lotter, 266 Neb. 758 , 669 N.W.2d 438 (2003). - 408 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 309 Neb. 401 for DNA testing and granted the State’s motion to deny DNA testing. 2021The district court ultimately denied Jacob’s motion 4 State v. Buckman, 267 Neb. 505, 515 , 675 N.W.2d 372, 381 (2004). 5 State v. Myers, 304 Neb. 789 , 937 N.W.2d 181 (2020). 6 State v. Dean, 270 Neb. 972 , 708 N.W.2d 640 (2006). 7 State v. Lotter, 266 Neb. 758 , 669 N.W.2d 438 (2003). - 408 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 309 Neb. 401 for DNA testing and granted the State’s motion to deny DNA testing. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Myers
green
2 sentences2021The district court ultimately denied Jacob’s motion 4 State v. Buckman, 267 Neb. 505, 515 , 675 N.W.2d 372, 381 (2004). 5 State v. Myers, 304 Neb. 789 , 937 N.W.2d 181 (2020). 6 State v. Dean, 270 Neb. 972 , 708 N.W.2d 640 (2006). 7 State v. Lotter, 266 Neb. 758 , 669 N.W.2d 438 (2003). - 408 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 309 Neb. 401 for DNA testing and granted the State’s motion to deny DNA testing. 2021The district court ultimately denied Jacob’s motion 4 State v. Buckman, 267 Neb. 505, 515 , 675 N.W.2d 372, 381 (2004). 5 State v. Myers, 304 Neb. 789 , 937 N.W.2d 181 (2020). 6 State v. Dean, 270 Neb. 972 , 708 N.W.2d 640 (2006). 7 State v. Lotter, 266 Neb. 758 , 669 N.W.2d 438 (2003). - 408 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. JACOB Cite as 309 Neb. 401 for DNA testing and granted the State’s motion to deny DNA testing. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Williams v. Lara
green
1 sentence2004Jacob, however, urges that the reasoning employed by the Texas court in Williams v. Lara, supra, and by the district court in the present case (regarding the payment of sales tax by nonresidents making purchases while temporarily in the state) is obviated by the requirement that taxpayer standing in Nebraska is granted to “resident taxpayers.” *705 See, Professional Firefighters of Omaha v. City of Omaha, 243 Neb. 166 , 498 N.W.2d 325 (1993) (standing of party to bring action must be based on special injury to himself or herself or on his or her status as resident taxpayer); Nebraska Sch. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Professional Firefighters of Omaha, Local 385 v. City of Omaha
green
2 sentences2004Jacob, however, urges that the reasoning employed by the Texas court in Williams v. Lara, supra, and by the district court in the present case (regarding the payment of sales tax by nonresidents making purchases while temporarily in the state) is obviated by the requirement that taxpayer standing in Nebraska is granted to “resident taxpayers.” *705 See, Professional Firefighters of Omaha v. City of Omaha, 243 Neb. 166 , 498 N.W.2d 325 (1993) (standing of party to bring action must be based on special injury to himself or herself or on his or her status as resident taxpayer); Nebraska Sch. 2004Jacob, however, urges that the reasoning employed by the Texas court in Williams v. Lara, supra, and by the district court in the present case (regarding the payment of sales tax by nonresidents making purchases while temporarily in the state) is obviated by the requirement that taxpayer standing in Nebraska is granted to “resident taxpayers.” *705 See, Professional Firefighters of Omaha v. City of Omaha, 243 Neb. 166 , 498 N.W.2d 325 (1993) (standing of party to bring action must be based on special injury to himself or herself or on his or her status as resident taxpayer); Nebraska Sch. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.