Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New Mexico opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Old Chief v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2001State v. Phillips, 2000-NMCA-028, ¶ 21 , 128 N.M. 777 , 999 P.2d 421 ; see also Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 181 , 117 S.Ct. 644 , 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997) (stating that although evidence of other bad acts is “ ‘relevant, the risk that a jury will convict for crimes other than those charged — or that, uncertain of guilt, it will convict anyway because a bad person deserves punishment— creates a prejudicial effect’ ” (quoting United States v. Moccia, 681 F.2d 61, 63 (1st Cir.1982))). 2001State v. Phillips, 2000-NMCA-028, ¶ 21 , 128 N.M. 777 , 999 P.2d 421 ; see also Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 181 , 117 S.Ct. 644 , 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997) (stating that although evidence of other bad acts is “ ‘relevant, the risk that a jury will convict for crimes other than those charged — or that, uncertain of guilt, it will convict anyway because a bad person deserves punishment— creates a prejudicial effect’ ” (quoting United States v. Moccia, 681 F.2d 61, 63 (1st Cir.1982))). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Nicholas Anthony Mocciagreen1 sentence2001State v. Phillips, 2000-NMCA-028, ¶ 21 , 128 N.M. 777 , 999 P.2d 421 ; see also Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 181 , 117 S.Ct. 644 , 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997) (stating that although evidence of other bad acts is “ ‘relevant, the risk that a jury will convict for crimes other than those charged — or that, uncertain of guilt, it will convict anyway because a bad person deserves punishment— creates a prejudicial effect’ ” (quoting United States v. Moccia, 681 F.2d 61, 63 (1st Cir.1982))). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Raymond Hoguegreen1 sentence1992State v. Aguayo, 114 N.M. 124 , 835 P.2d 840 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 113 N.M. 744 , 832 P.2d 1223 (1992); see also United States v. Hogue, 827 F.2d 660, 662-63 (10th Cir.1987); 2 Jack B. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gabalbon Ex Rel. Baldizan v. Erisa Mortgage Co.
green
2 sentences2015Co., 1997-NMCA-120, ¶ 26 , 124 N.M. 296, 305 , 949 P.2d 1193 , aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 1999-NMSC-039 , 128 N.M. 84 , 990 P.2d 197 . 2015Co., 1997-NMCA-120, ¶ 26 , 124 N.M. 296, 305 , 949 P.2d 1193 , aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 1999-NMSC-039 , 128 N.M. 84 , 990 P.2d 197 . | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Gabaldon Ex Rel. Baldizan v. Erisa Mortgage Co.
green
2 sentences2015Co., 1997-NMCA-120, ¶ 26 , 124 N.M. 296, 305 , 949 P.2d 1193 , aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 1999-NMSC-039 , 128 N.M. 84 , 990 P.2d 197 . 2015Co., 1997-NMCA-120, ¶ 26 , 124 N.M. 296, 305 , 949 P.2d 1193 , aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 1999-NMSC-039 , 128 N.M. 84 , 990 P.2d 197 . | 2 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Ruiz
green
1 sentence2024The Evidence Satisfies a Valid Exception to the General Prohibition on Propensity Evidence {11} “Rule 11-404(B) [NMRA] is a specialized rule of relevancy that . . . limits the admissibility of evidence that, although relevant, is unfairly prejudicial to the accused.” Ruiz, 2001-NMCA-097, ¶ 13 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Phillips
green
2 sentences2001State v. Phillips, 2000-NMCA-028, ¶ 21 , 128 N.M. 777 , 999 P.2d 421 ; see also Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 181 , 117 S.Ct. 644 , 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997) (stating that although evidence of other bad acts is “ ‘relevant, the risk that a jury will convict for crimes other than those charged — or that, uncertain of guilt, it will convict anyway because a bad person deserves punishment— creates a prejudicial effect’ ” (quoting United States v. Moccia, 681 F.2d 61, 63 (1st Cir.1982))). 2001State v. Phillips, 2000-NMCA-028, ¶ 21 , 128 N.M. 777 , 999 P.2d 421 ; see also Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 181 , 117 S.Ct. 644 , 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997) (stating that although evidence of other bad acts is “ ‘relevant, the risk that a jury will convict for crimes other than those charged — or that, uncertain of guilt, it will convict anyway because a bad person deserves punishment— creates a prejudicial effect’ ” (quoting United States v. Moccia, 681 F.2d 61, 63 (1st Cir.1982))). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Aguayo
green
2 sentences1992State v. Aguayo, 114 N.M. 124 , 835 P.2d 840 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 113 N.M. 744 , 832 P.2d 1223 (1992); see also United States v. Hogue, 827 F.2d 660, 662-63 (10th Cir.1987); 2 Jack B. 1992State v. Aguayo, 114 N.M. 124 , 835 P.2d 840 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 113 N.M. 744 , 832 P.2d 1223 (1992); see also United States v. Hogue, 827 F.2d 660, 662-63 (10th Cir.1987); 2 Jack B. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.