Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Joseph v. Ruffogreen2 sentences2017The stated returns on the investment offered to him, 300% in one week with zero risk, were so extraordinary as to be unbelievable, triggering the duty of reasonable inquiry into Hager’s actual authority (see Collision Plan Unlimited v Bankers Trust Co., 63 NY2d 827, 830-831 [1984]; ER Holdings, LLC v 122 W.P.R. 2017However, it had a duty of reasonable inquiry into the scope of Luigi Rosabianca’s authority (id.; see also Collision Plan Unlimited, 63 NY2d at 830 ; 1230 Park Assoc., LLC v Northern Source, LLC, 48 AD3d 355, 356 [1st Dept 2008]). | 4 | 4 |
ER Holdings, LLC v. 122 W.P.R. Corp.green1 sentence2017Corp., 65 AD3d 1275, 1277 [2009]; Global Mins. & Metals Corp. v Holme, 35 AD3d 93, 100 [2006]; Heffernan v Marine Midland Bank, 267 AD2d 83, 84 [1999]). | 1 | 1 |
Global Minerals & Metals Corp. v. Holmegreen1 sentence2017Corp., 65 AD3d 1275, 1277 [2009]; Global Mins. & Metals Corp. v Holme, 35 AD3d 93, 100 [2006]; Heffernan v Marine Midland Bank, 267 AD2d 83, 84 [1999]). | 1 | 1 |
1230 Park Associates, LLC v. Northern Source, LLCgreen2 sentences2017However, it had a duty of reasonable inquiry into the scope of Luigi Rosabianca's authority ( id. ; see also Collision Plan Unlimited , 63 NY2d at 830 ; 1230 Park Assoc., LLC v Northern Source, LLC , 48 AD3d 355, 356 [1st Dept 2008]). 2017However, it had a duty of reasonable inquiry into the scope of Luigi Rosabianca’s authority (id.; see also Collision Plan Unlimited, 63 NY2d at 830 ; 1230 Park Assoc., LLC v Northern Source, LLC, 48 AD3d 355, 356 [1st Dept 2008]). | 1 | 1 |
Heffernan v. Marine Midland Bankgreen1 sentence2017Corp., 65 AD3d 1275, 1277 [2009]; Global Mins. & Metals Corp. v Holme, 35 AD3d 93, 100 [2006]; Heffernan v Marine Midland Bank, 267 AD2d 83, 84 [1999]). | 1 | 1 |
Hallock v. Stategreen1 sentence2015The plaintiff also contends that the purchaser’s reliance on Godt’s apparent authority to execute the April asset sale agreement on her behalf using a power of attorney was unreasonable (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 231 [1984] [“a third party with whom the agent deals may rely on an appearance of authority only to the extent that such reliance is reasonable”]; Collision Plan Unlimited v Bankers Trust Co., 63 NY2d 827, 831 [1984] [a party who invokes the doctrine of apparent authority assumes a duty of reasonable inquiry]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ford v. Unity Hospital
green
2 sentences2017However, it had a duty of reasonable inquiry into the scope of Luigi Rosabianca's authority ( id. ; see also Collision Plan Unlimited , 63 NY2d at 830 ; 1230 Park Assoc., LLC v Northern Source, LLC , 48 AD3d 355, 356 [1st Dept 2008]). 1984(Ford v Unity Hosp., 32 NY2d 464, 472-473 ; General Overseas Films v Robin Int., 542 F Supp 684, 695-696 ; Karavos Compania v Atlantica Export Corp., 588 F2d 1, 10.) This issue, involving inferences to be drawn from evidentiary proof, cannot be determined on the documentary evidence submitted on the motion. | 2 | 1984–2017 |
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Adoue
neutral
2 sentences1985Co. v Adoue, 104 Tex 379, 138 SW 383 ; Dollar Sav. & Trust Co. v Crawford, 69 W Va 109, 70 SE 1089 ; see, 5A Michie, Banks and Banking § 208.) A bank is under a duty of reasonable inquiry as to a representative’s actual perimeter of authority when a fiduciary or other seeks to invoke apparent authority. 1985Co. v Adoue , 104 Tex 379, 138 SW 383 ; Dollar Sav. & Trust Co. v Crawford , 69 W Va 109, 70 SE 1089 ; see , 5A Michie, Banks and Banking § 208.) A bank is under a duty of reasonable inquiry as to a representative's actual perimeter of authority when a fiduciary or other seeks to invoke apparent authority. ( Collision Plan Unlimited v Bankers Trust Co. , 63 N.Y.2d 827, 830 .) By failing to conduct a simple inquiry as to the terms of the letters *447 of guardianship, when on notice of a fiduciary relationship and of an issue as to apparent authority, the bank never determined whether the signat | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Dollar Saving & Trust Co. v. Crawford
green
2 sentences1985Co. v Adoue, 104 Tex 379, 138 SW 383 ; Dollar Sav. & Trust Co. v Crawford, 69 W Va 109, 70 SE 1089 ; see, 5A Michie, Banks and Banking § 208.) A bank is under a duty of reasonable inquiry as to a representative’s actual perimeter of authority when a fiduciary or other seeks to invoke apparent authority. 1985Co. v Adoue , 104 Tex 379, 138 SW 383 ; Dollar Sav. & Trust Co. v Crawford , 69 W Va 109, 70 SE 1089 ; see , 5A Michie, Banks and Banking § 208.) A bank is under a duty of reasonable inquiry as to a representative's actual perimeter of authority when a fiduciary or other seeks to invoke apparent authority. ( Collision Plan Unlimited v Bankers Trust Co. , 63 N.Y.2d 827, 830 .) By failing to conduct a simple inquiry as to the terms of the letters *447 of guardianship, when on notice of a fiduciary relationship and of an issue as to apparent authority, the bank never determined whether the signat | 1 | 1985–1985 |
General Overseas Films, Ltd. v. Robin International, Inc.
green
2 sentences1984(Ford v Unity Hosp., 32 NY2d 464, 472-473 ; General Overseas Films v Robin Int., 542 F Supp 684, 695-696 ; Karavos Compania v Atlantica Export Corp., 588 F2d 1, 10.) This issue, involving inferences to be drawn from evidentiary proof, cannot be determined on the documentary evidence submitted on the motion. 1984(General Overseas Films v Robin Int., 542 F Supp 684 , supra.) Contracts of guarantee and suretyship not in accord with the regular line of corporate business cannot be made without express shareholder authority. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.