Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Amanda SS.green1 sentence2007Accordingly, we cannot say that Supreme Court erred in extending supervision or abused its discretion in continuing to limit respondent’s contact with his children (see Matter of Caleb L, 289 AD2d at 902 ; see also Matter of Amanda SS, 284 AD2d 588, 589 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 606 [2001]; Matter of Catherine E, 269 AD2d at 703 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fonvil v. Alexandre
green
1 sentence2022Since the parties agreed on the hearing date of April 28, 2022, and the Board of Elections issued its formal determination invalidating the designating petition two days before that date, the Supreme Court's denial of Fuchs's request for an adjournment was a provident exercise of discretion ( see Matter of Fonvil v Alexandre , 87 AD3d 640 ). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Henao v. Coughlin
neutral
1 sentence2020Although the court is empowered to impose a sentence of incarceration of up to six months for willful failure to comply with a support order ( see Family Ct Act § 454[3][a]; Matter of Cox v Cox , 133 AD2d 828 ), such incarceration may only continue until the offender complies with the support order ( see Judiciary Law § 774[1]; Hymowitz v Hymowitz , 149 AD2d 568, 568-569 ). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Hymowitz v. Hymowitz
green
1 sentence2020Although the court is empowered to impose a sentence of incarceration of up to six months for willful failure to comply with a support order ( see Family Ct Act § 454[3][a]; Matter of Cox v Cox , 133 AD2d 828 ), such incarceration may only continue until the offender complies with the support order ( see Judiciary Law § 774[1]; Hymowitz v Hymowitz , 149 AD2d 568, 568-569 ). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In re Catherine P.
green
1 sentence2007Accordingly, we cannot say that Supreme Court erred in extending supervision or abused its discretion in continuing to limit respondent’s contact with his children (see Matter of Caleb L, 289 AD2d at 902 ; see also Matter of Amanda SS, 284 AD2d 588, 589 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 606 [2001]; Matter of Catherine E, 269 AD2d at 703 ). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Lyons v. Lyons
green
1 sentence2007Accordingly, we cannot say that Supreme Court erred in extending supervision or abused its discretion in continuing to limit respondent’s contact with his children (see Matter of Caleb L, 289 AD2d at 902 ; see also Matter of Amanda SS, 284 AD2d 588, 589 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 606 [2001]; Matter of Catherine E, 269 AD2d at 703 ). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Kleinberg v. Ambassador Associates
green
1 sentence2003Although the parties agreed in principle to settle this action, the terms of that settlement were not made definite and complete in open court, nor was there a definite agreement in writing enforceable pursuant to CPLR 2104 (see Kleinberg v Ambassador Assoc., 64 NY2d 733 [1984]; Falcone v Khurana, 294 AD2d 535 [2002]; ITS Funding v A&M Constr. of Orange County, 293 AD2d 653 [2002]; Kowalski v Fisher 40th & 3rd Co., 266 AD2d 514 [1999]; Johnson v Four G’s Truck Rental, 244 AD2d 319 [1997]). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Kessler v. Kessler
green
1 sentence2003Although the parties agreed in principle to settle this action, the terms of that settlement were not made definite and complete in open court, nor was there a definite agreement in writing enforceable pursuant to CPLR 2104 (see Kleinberg v Ambassador Assoc., 64 NY2d 733 [1984]; Falcone v Khurana, 294 AD2d 535 [2002]; ITS Funding v A&M Constr. of Orange County, 293 AD2d 653 [2002]; Kowalski v Fisher 40th & 3rd Co., 266 AD2d 514 [1999]; Johnson v Four G’s Truck Rental, 244 AD2d 319 [1997]). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Hicks v. Schoetz
green
1 sentence2003“Absent the formalities required by-statute, the alleged stipulation of settlement is not enforceable” (Matter of Hicks v Schoetz, 261 AD2d 944 [1999]). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Kowalski v. Fisher 40th & 3rd Co.
green
1 sentence2003Although the parties agreed in principle to settle this action, the terms of that settlement were not made definite and complete in open court, nor was there a definite agreement in writing enforceable pursuant to CPLR 2104 (see Kleinberg v Ambassador Assoc., 64 NY2d 733 [1984]; Falcone v Khurana, 294 AD2d 535 [2002]; ITS Funding v A&M Constr. of Orange County, 293 AD2d 653 [2002]; Kowalski v Fisher 40th & 3rd Co., 266 AD2d 514 [1999]; Johnson v Four G’s Truck Rental, 244 AD2d 319 [1997]). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
ITS Funding, Inc. v. A & M Construction of Orange County, Inc.
green
1 sentence2003Although the parties agreed in principle to settle this action, the terms of that settlement were not made definite and complete in open court, nor was there a definite agreement in writing enforceable pursuant to CPLR 2104 (see Kleinberg v Ambassador Assoc., 64 NY2d 733 [1984]; Falcone v Khurana, 294 AD2d 535 [2002]; ITS Funding v A&M Constr. of Orange County, 293 AD2d 653 [2002]; Kowalski v Fisher 40th & 3rd Co., 266 AD2d 514 [1999]; Johnson v Four G’s Truck Rental, 244 AD2d 319 [1997]). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Falcone v. Khurana
green
1 sentence2003Although the parties agreed in principle to settle this action, the terms of that settlement were not made definite and complete in open court, nor was there a definite agreement in writing enforceable pursuant to CPLR 2104 (see Kleinberg v Ambassador Assoc., 64 NY2d 733 [1984]; Falcone v Khurana, 294 AD2d 535 [2002]; ITS Funding v A&M Constr. of Orange County, 293 AD2d 653 [2002]; Kowalski v Fisher 40th & 3rd Co., 266 AD2d 514 [1999]; Johnson v Four G’s Truck Rental, 244 AD2d 319 [1997]). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Orange County Publications v. Council of the City of Newburgh
green
1 sentence1986In Matter of Orange County Pub. v Council of City of Newburgh ( 60 AD2d 409, 419 , affd 45 NY2d 947 [on opn of Rabin, J., of App Div]), the courts were specific in stating that the word "meeting” as set forth in Public Officers Law § 98 (renum § 103) "includes the gathering or meeting of a public body for the purpose of transacting public business, whenever a quorum is present, whether or not a vote of members of the public body is taken.” Likewise, in Matter of Oneonta Star Div. of Ottaway Newspapers v Board of Trustees ( 66 AD2d 51 ), while dealing with a question of sufficiency of pleadings | 1 | 1986–1986 |
In re Miguel M.
green
1 sentence1986In Matter of Orange County Pub. v Council of City of Newburgh ( 60 AD2d 409, 419 , affd 45 NY2d 947 [on opn of Rabin, J., of App Div]), the courts were specific in stating that the word "meeting” as set forth in Public Officers Law § 98 (renum § 103) "includes the gathering or meeting of a public body for the purpose of transacting public business, whenever a quorum is present, whether or not a vote of members of the public body is taken.” Likewise, in Matter of Oneonta Star Div. of Ottaway Newspapers v Board of Trustees ( 66 AD2d 51 ), while dealing with a question of sufficiency of pleadings | 1 | 1986–1986 |
MATTER OF ORANGE COUNTY PUBL'N, DIV. OF OTTAWAY NEWSPAPERS, INC. v. Council of the City of Newburgh
green
1 sentence1986In Matter of Orange County Pub. v Council of City of Newburgh ( 60 AD2d 409, 419 , affd 45 NY2d 947 [on opn of Rabin, J., of App Div]), the courts were specific in stating that the word "meeting” as set forth in Public Officers Law § 98 (renum § 103) "includes the gathering or meeting of a public body for the purpose of transacting public business, whenever a quorum is present, whether or not a vote of members of the public body is taken.” Likewise, in Matter of Oneonta Star Div. of Ottaway Newspapers v Board of Trustees ( 66 AD2d 51 ), while dealing with a question of sufficiency of pleadings | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.