Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jana L. v. West 129th Street Realty Corp.green2 sentences2021Realty Corp ., 22 AD3d 274, 278 [1st Dept 2005]). 2021Realty Corp ., 22 AD3d 274, 278 [1st Dept 2005]). | 2 | 2 |
Danann Realty Corp. v. Harrisgreen2 sentences2021Additionally, the peculiar knowledge exception to claims of fraudulent representation does not apply ( Danann Realty Corp. v Harris , 5 NY2d 317, 322 [1959]; Schumaker v Mather , 133 NY 590 , 596 [1892]; see also Jana L. v West 129th St. 2021Additionally, the peculiar knowledge exception to claims of fraudulent representation does not apply ( Danann Realty Corp. v Harris , 5 NY2d 317, 322 [1959]; Schumaker v Mather , 133 NY 590 , 596 [1892]; see also Jana L. v West 129th St. | 2 | 2 |
MBIA Insurance v. Lynchgreen2 sentences2026Corp. v Merrill Lynch</i>, 81 AD3d 419, 419 [1st Dept 2011] [declining to apply the peculiar knowledge exception because the plaintiff was a sophisticated business entity that could have obtained the truth about defendants' allegedly fraudulent representations through investigation]). 2017Corp. v Merrill Lynch , 81 AD3d 419 (1st Dept 2011) ("Given their level of sophistication and the undisputed fact that the information was not exclusively in defendants' possession, plaintiffs' contention that it would have been impractical to conduct the investigation necessary to discern the truth of defendants' allegedly fraudulent representations does not satisfy the requirements of the peculiar knowledge exception."). | 1 | 2 |
Hawthorne Group v. RRE Venturesgreen1 sentence2011The cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing cannot be maintained because it is premised on the same conduct that underlies the breach of contract cause of action and is “intrinsically tied to the damages allegedly resulting from a breach of the contract” (see Hawthorne Group v RRE Ventures, 7 AD3d 320, 323 [2004] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). | 1 | 1 |
In re Linngreen1 sentence2011Given their level of sophistication and the undisputed fact that the information was not exclusively in defendants’ possession, plaintiffs’ contention that it would have been impractical to conduct the investigation necessary to discern the truth of defendants’ allegedly fraudulent representations does not satisfy the requirements of the peculiar knowledge exception (see Steinhardt Group v Citicorp, 272 AD2d 255, 257 [2000]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Schumaker v. . Mather
green
2 sentences2021Additionally, the peculiar knowledge exception to claims of fraudulent representation does not apply ( Danann Realty Corp. v Harris , 5 NY2d 317, 322 [1959]; Schumaker v Mather , 133 NY 590 , 596 [1892]; see also Jana L. v West 129th St. 2021Additionally, the peculiar knowledge exception to claims of fraudulent representation does not apply ( Danann Realty Corp. v Harris , 5 NY2d 317, 322 [1959]; Schumaker v Mather , 133 NY 590 , 596 [1892]; see also Jana L. v West 129th St. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.