Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Goncalves v. Stuyvesant Development Associatesgreen1 sentence2017Assoc., 232 AD2d 275, 276 [1st Dept 1996]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Woodstock Lake Ass'n v. Pleasure Crest Corp.
neutral
2 sentences1983Thus, we refrain from considering the issues of excusable default and the presence of a meritorious defense, the grounds relied upon by Special Term in granting defendant’s motion” (see Woodstock Lake Assn. v Pleasure Crest Corp., 65 AD2d 867 ; Red Creek Nat. 1979Thus, we refrain from considering the issues of excusable default and the presence of a meritorious defense, the grounds relied upon by Special Term in granting defendant’s motion (see Woodstock Lake Assoc, v Pleasure Crest Corp., 65 AD2d 867 ). | 3 | 1979–1983 |
Mediavilla v. Gurman
green
1 sentence2025Ultimately, it is for the court, in its sound discretion, to assess both the adequacy of the proffered excuse and the presence of a meritorious defense (Mediavilla v. Gurman, 272 AD2d 146 [1st Dept 2000]). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Red Creek National Bank v. Blue Star Ranch, Ltd.
green
1 sentence1983Bank v Blue Star Ranch, 58 AD2d 983, 984 ). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Union National Bank v. Davis
neutral
1 sentence1981Bank v Davis, 67 AD2d 1034 ; Woodstock Lake Assn. v Pleasure Crest Corp., 65 AD2d 867 ; see, also, Red Creek Nat. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Frey v. Central Valley National Bank
neutral
1 sentence1981Thus any consideration of the issues of excusable default and the presence of a meritorious defense (see Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594 ; Bruno v Village of Port Chester, 77 AD2d 580 ) was rendered unnecessary (Union Nat. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Barasch v. Micucci
green
1 sentence1981Thus any consideration of the issues of excusable default and the presence of a meritorious defense (see Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594 ; Bruno v Village of Port Chester, 77 AD2d 580 ) was rendered unnecessary (Union Nat. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.