principle of sovereign immunity (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

principle of sovereign immunity in New York

5 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2021 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Hyatt green
scotus · 2019
2 sentences

2021The Framers of the US Constitution recognized that the principle of sovereign immunity is a constitutional limitation on the federal judicial power established in Article III, and believed the principle to be self-evident, unless altered by the constitution or certain constitutional amendments ( see Hyatt , 139 S Ct at 1494-1496 ).

2021The Framers of the US Constitution recognized that the principle of sovereign immunity is a constitutional limitation on the federal judicial power established in Article III, and believed the principle to be self-evident, unless altered by the constitution or certain constitutional amendments ( see Hyatt , 139 S Ct at 1494-1496 ).

22021–2021
Pascarella v. City of New York neutral
nysupct · 1987
1 sentence

1989In that regard, the court declared that "[bjased on the evidence presented by plaintiff and an analysis of the special duty exception, I concluded that a special relationship existed between Officer Pascarella and the police department” ( 135 Misc 2d 719, 724 , supra).

11989–1989
Westgate North, Inc. v. State University green
nyclaimsct · 1973
2 sentences

1980We, as does Texas, recognize the principle of sovereign immunity and hold that it extends to units of the State University of New York as a component of State government. ( Westgate North v State Univ. of N. Y. , 77 Misc 2d 611 , affd 47 AD2d 1004 ; State Univ. of N. Y. v Syracuse Univ. , 206 Misc 1003, 1004 , affd 285 App Div 59, 61-62 ; cf. George R.

1980(Westgate North v State Univ. of N. Y., 77 Misc 2d 611 , affd 47 AD2d 1004 ; State Univ. of N. Y. v Syracuse Univ., 206 Misc 1003, 1004 , affd 285 App Div 59, 61-62 ; cf. George R.

11980–1980
State University v. Syracuse University green
nyappdiv · 1954
2 sentences

1980We, as does Texas, recognize the principle of sovereign immunity and hold that it extends to units of the State University of New York as a component of State government. ( Westgate North v State Univ. of N. Y. , 77 Misc 2d 611 , affd 47 AD2d 1004 ; State Univ. of N. Y. v Syracuse Univ. , 206 Misc 1003, 1004 , affd 285 App Div 59, 61-62 ; cf. George R.

1980(Westgate North v State Univ. of N. Y., 77 Misc 2d 611 , affd 47 AD2d 1004 ; State Univ. of N. Y. v Syracuse Univ., 206 Misc 1003, 1004 , affd 285 App Div 59, 61-62 ; cf. George R.

11980–1980
State University v. Syracuse University green
nysupct · 1954
2 sentences

1980We, as does Texas, recognize the principle of sovereign immunity and hold that it extends to units of the State University of New York as a component of State government. ( Westgate North v State Univ. of N. Y. , 77 Misc 2d 611 , affd 47 AD2d 1004 ; State Univ. of N. Y. v Syracuse Univ. , 206 Misc 1003, 1004 , affd 285 App Div 59, 61-62 ; cf. George R.

1980(Westgate North v State Univ. of N. Y., 77 Misc 2d 611 , affd 47 AD2d 1004 ; State Univ. of N. Y. v Syracuse Univ., 206 Misc 1003, 1004 , affd 285 App Div 59, 61-62 ; cf. George R.

11980–1980
Hassard v. United States of Mexico neutral
· 1899
1 sentence

1969(See, e. g., Schooner Exch. v. M’Faddon, 7 Cranch [11 U. S.] 116, 137; Hassard v. United States of Mexico, 173 N. Y. 645 , affg. 46 App. Div. 623 , affg. 29 Misc. 511, 512 .) This principle of sovereign immunity—which is, of course, acknowledged by the city—renders the levy and assessment of a tax against Argentina a futile gesture, serving only to embarrass a friendly State without any concomitant benefit to the city.

11969–1969
Hassard v. United States of Mexico neutral
· 1899
1 sentence

1969(See, e. g., Schooner Exch. v. M’Faddon, 7 Cranch [11 U. S.] 116, 137; Hassard v. United States of Mexico, 173 N. Y. 645 , affg. 46 App. Div. 623 , affg. 29 Misc. 511, 512 .) This principle of sovereign immunity—which is, of course, acknowledged by the city—renders the levy and assessment of a tax against Argentina a futile gesture, serving only to embarrass a friendly State without any concomitant benefit to the city.

11969–1969
Seletskey v. . Third Avenue Railroad Company neutral
ny · 1903
1 sentence

1969(See, e. g., Schooner Exch. v. M’Faddon, 7 Cranch [11 U. S.] 116, 137; Hassard v. United States of Mexico, 173 N. Y. 645 , affg. 46 App. Div. 623 , affg. 29 Misc. 511, 512 .) This principle of sovereign immunity—which is, of course, acknowledged by the city—renders the levy and assessment of a tax against Argentina a futile gesture, serving only to embarrass a friendly State without any concomitant benefit to the city.

11969–1969

Where else courts name it

TN 8 (1998–2011) CT 7 (1977–2024) AL 7 (2003–2025) UT 6 (1960–2005) MD 5 (2008–2015) NY 5 (1969–2021) CA 4 (1974–2005) NM 4 (1994–2004) FL 4 (1980–2002) IL 4 (1974–1989) MA 3 (1966–2016) OR 3 (1962–2026) NJ 3 (1965–1995) KY 3 (2000–2011) MI 2 (1974–1974) LA 2 (1961–1990) IN 2 (1994–2006) WA 2 (1975–1976)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check