Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1962–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.green2 sentences2021The court also properly determined that the directors and majority shareholders were primary actors with respect to the transactions at issue under Kreutter v McFadden Oil Corp. ( 71 NY2d 460, 467 [1988]). 2009New York courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant who “transacts any business within the state or contracts anywhere to supply goods or services in the state” (CPLR 302 [a] [1]), even where that defendant has never physically entered the state (see Parke-Bernet Galleries v Franklyn, 26 NY2d 13, 17 [1970]), “so long as the defendant’s activities here were purposeful and there is a substantial relationship between the transactions and the claim asserted” (Kreutter v McFadden Oil Corp., 71 NY2d 460, 467 [1988]). | 3 | 3 |
Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. Franklyngreen1 sentence2009New York courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant who “transacts any business within the state or contracts anywhere to supply goods or services in the state” (CPLR 302 [a] [1]), even where that defendant has never physically entered the state (see Parke-Bernet Galleries v Franklyn, 26 NY2d 13, 17 [1970]), “so long as the defendant’s activities here were purposeful and there is a substantial relationship between the transactions and the claim asserted” (Kreutter v McFadden Oil Corp., 71 NY2d 460, 467 [1988]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SAL
green
2 sentences2021Contrary to defendants' arguments, plaintiffs' causes of action arise from defendants' New York contacts, since plaintiffs demonstrated that, in light of all the circumstances, there is an articulable nexus or substantial relationship between the transactions and the claim asserted ( id. ). 2021Contrary to defendants' arguments, plaintiffs' causes of action arise from defendants' New York contacts, since plaintiffs demonstrated that, in light of all the circumstances, there is an articulable nexus or substantial relationship between the transactions and the claim asserted ( id. ). | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. v. Montana Board of Investments
green
1 sentence2009Here, the plaintiffs satisfied their burden, at this stage of the litigation, of showing that this standard has been met (see Fischbarg v Doucet, 9 NY3d 375 [2007]; Deutsche Bank Sec., Inc. v Montana Bd. of Invs., 7 NY3d 65 [2006]; Crystal Cove Seafood Corp. v Chelsea Harbor, LLC, 47 AD 3d 670 [2008]; Comely v Dynamic HVAC Supply, LLC, 44 AD3d 986 [2007]). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Fischbarg v. Doucet
green
1 sentence2009Here, the plaintiffs satisfied their burden, at this stage of the litigation, of showing that this standard has been met (see Fischbarg v Doucet, 9 NY3d 375 [2007]; Deutsche Bank Sec., Inc. v Montana Bd. of Invs., 7 NY3d 65 [2006]; Crystal Cove Seafood Corp. v Chelsea Harbor, LLC, 47 AD 3d 670 [2008]; Comely v Dynamic HVAC Supply, LLC, 44 AD3d 986 [2007]). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Cornely v. Dynamic HVAC Supply, LLC
green
1 sentence2009Here, the plaintiffs satisfied their burden, at this stage of the litigation, of showing that this standard has been met (see Fischbarg v Doucet, 9 NY3d 375 [2007]; Deutsche Bank Sec., Inc. v Montana Bd. of Invs., 7 NY3d 65 [2006]; Crystal Cove Seafood Corp. v Chelsea Harbor, LLC, 47 AD 3d 670 [2008]; Comely v Dynamic HVAC Supply, LLC, 44 AD3d 986 [2007]). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Crystal Cove Seafood Corp. v. Chelsea Harbor, LLC
green
1 sentence2009Here, the plaintiffs satisfied their burden, at this stage of the litigation, of showing that this standard has been met (see Fischbarg v Doucet, 9 NY3d 375 [2007]; Deutsche Bank Sec., Inc. v Montana Bd. of Invs., 7 NY3d 65 [2006]; Crystal Cove Seafood Corp. v Chelsea Harbor, LLC, 47 AD 3d 670 [2008]; Comely v Dynamic HVAC Supply, LLC, 44 AD3d 986 [2007]). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
People v. . Molineux
green
1 sentence1990Defendant argues that it was error to allow Officer McCarthy to testify as to the prior transactions in violation of the Molineux rule (People v Molineux, 168 NY 264 ). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Brown
green
1 sentence1990This contention was not preserved for review by timely objection (People v Qualls, 55 NY2d 733 ; People v Brown, 161 AD2d 527 ; CPL 470.05 [2]). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Qualls
green
1 sentence1990This contention was not preserved for review by timely objection (People v Qualls, 55 NY2d 733 ; People v Brown, 161 AD2d 527 ; CPL 470.05 [2]). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Estate Of Clinton H. Martin, Deceased
neutral
1 sentence1962MacLaren v. Denno (173 F. Sup. 237, affd. 272 F. 2d 191 , cert, denied 363 U. S. 814 ) the court held at page 241: ‘ ‘ The facts that the probationer must make his defense to the probation violation prior to a possible criminal trial encompassing the same transactions as the violation does not violate the probationer’s constitution [sic] rights.” The court agrees with that conclusion. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Barron v. Ohio
green
1 sentence1962MacLaren v. Denno (173 F. Sup. 237, affd. 272 F. 2d 191 , cert, denied 363 U. S. 814 ) the court held at page 241: ‘ ‘ The facts that the probationer must make his defense to the probation violation prior to a possible criminal trial encompassing the same transactions as the violation does not violate the probationer’s constitution [sic] rights.” The court agrees with that conclusion. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.