Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Martingreen2 sentences2008R. 52(B) states only that a reviewing court "may" notice plain forfeited errors; a court is not obliged to correct them. * * * Barnes at 27; see, also, State v. Martin , 103 Ohio St.3d 385 , 2004-Ohio-5471 , ¶ 52 (Moyer, C.J., concurring) (recognizing that "[e]ven if the defendant establishes that plain error affected his substantial rights, the appellate court need not necessarily reverse the judgment of the trial court"). 2008See, also, State v. Martin , 103 Ohio St.3d 385 , 2004-Ohio-5471 , ¶ 52 (Moyer, C.J., concurring) (recognizing that, "[e]ven if the defendant establishes that plain error affected his substantial rights, the appellate court need not necessarily reverse the judgment of the trial court"). | 4 | 4 |
State v. Barnesgreen2 sentences2007Barnes, 94 Ohio St.3d at 27 , 759 N.E.2d 1240 ; see, also, State v. Martin, 103 Ohio St.3d 385 , 2004-Ohio-5471 , 816 N.E.2d 227, at ¶ 52 (Moyer, C.J., concurring) (recognizing that “[e]ven if the defendant establishes that plain error affected his substantial rights, the appellate court need not necessarily reverse the judgment *506 of the trial court”). 2007Barnes, 94 Ohio St.3d at 27 , 759 N.E.2d 1240 ; see, also, State v. Martin, 103 Ohio St.3d 385 , 2004-Ohio-5471 , 816 N.E.2d 227, at ¶ 52 (Moyer, C.J., concurring) (recognizing that “[e]ven if the defendant establishes that plain error affected his substantial rights, the appellate court need not necessarily reverse the judgment *506 of the trial court”). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Long
green
2 sentences2008Thus, the Supreme Court of Ohio has "admonish[ed] courts to notice plain error `with the utmost caution, under exceptional circumstances and only to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice.'" Barnes at 27, quoting State v. Long (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 91 , paragraph three of the syllabus. 2008Thus, the Supreme Court has "admonish[ed] courts to notice plain error `with the utmost caution, under exceptional circumstances and only to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice.'" Barnes at 27, quoting State v. Long (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 91 , paragraph three of the syllabus. | 5 | 2004–2008 |