Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Toledo v. Stuartgreen2 sentences2019"If the defendant fails to produce supporting affidavits, the trial court, in its discretion, may deny the motion summarily without a hearing.” State v. Rogers, 68 Ohio App.3d 4, 7 , 587 N.E.2d 381 (9th Dist.1990), citing Toledo v. Stuart, 11 Ohio App.3d 292, 293 , 465 N.E.2d 474 (6th Dist.1983). 2018According to Crim.R. 33(C), however, “[t]he causes enumerated in subsection (A)(2) * * * must be sustained by affidavit showing their truth[.]” “Crim.R. 33(C) requires affidavits which support the motion alleging grounds under [Crim.R. 33(A)(2) and] * * * [i]f the defendant fails to produce supporting affidavits, the trial court, in its discretion, may deny the motion summarily without a hearing.” State v. Rogers, 68 Ohio App.3d 4, 7 (9th Dist.1990), citing Toledo v. Stuart, 11 Ohio App.3d 292, 293 (6th Dist.1983). | 1 | 5 |
State v. Rogersgreen2 sentences2019"If the defendant fails to produce supporting affidavits, the trial court, in its discretion, may deny the motion summarily without a hearing.” State v. Rogers, 68 Ohio App.3d 4, 7 , 587 N.E.2d 381 (9th Dist.1990), citing Toledo v. Stuart, 11 Ohio App.3d 292, 293 , 465 N.E.2d 474 (6th Dist.1983). 2019"If the defendant fails to produce supporting affidavits, the trial court, in its discretion, may deny the motion summarily without a hearing.” State v. Rogers, 68 Ohio App.3d 4, 7 , 587 N.E.2d 381 (9th Dist.1990), citing Toledo v. Stuart, 11 Ohio App.3d 292, 293 , 465 N.E.2d 474 (6th Dist.1983). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||