Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washingtongreen1 sentence2021From Patton’s brief, it is unclear what action she believes trial counsel should have taken on her behalf; however, we will presume that she is asserting that trial counsel should have requested a continuance of the trial to a date on or after the effective date of the amended statute. {¶9} In order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Patton must show that “counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that prejudice arose from counsel’s performance.” State v. Reynolds, 80 Ohio St.3d 670, 674 (1998), citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Reynoldsgreen1 sentence2021From Patton’s brief, it is unclear what action she believes trial counsel should have taken on her behalf; however, we will presume that she is asserting that trial counsel should have requested a continuance of the trial to a date on or after the effective date of the amended statute. {¶9} In order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Patton must show that “counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that prejudice arose from counsel’s performance.” State v. Reynolds, 80 Ohio St.3d 670, 674 (1998), citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Maryland v. Buie
green
2 sentences2013The trial court found that the police officers’ protective sweep of Patton’s home was not justified under Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325, 334 , 110 S.Ct. 1093 , 108 L.Ed.2d 276 (1990). 2013The trial court found that the police officers’ protective sweep of Patton’s home was not justified under Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325, 334 , 110 S.Ct. 1093 , 108 L.Ed.2d 276 (1990). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Hendricks v. Patton
neutral
1 sentence2013Dane, 1985 WL 7865 at *1. [Cite as Hendricks v. Patton, 2013-Ohio-2121 .] {¶ 19} Nor are we persuaded by Patton’s claim that the addendum lacked legal effect because it was not signed by a witness. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Patton
green
1 sentence2007The court explained, "[i]t would be a mockery of justice to allow a defendant who has sought and obtained a stay of execution of his sentence in order to appeal to avoid incarceration because he failed to surrender himself to authorities after his conviction and sentence were affirmed." Id., see, also, State v. Dawley (Sept. 25, 1986), Cuyahoga App. No. 50974 (finding 45 month delay in execution of three year prison term was not violation of speedy trial or cruel and unusual punishment). {¶ 20} In the case before us, appellant's sentence was imposed without delay, and then stayed, at her reque | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.
green
1 sentence2004Myers v. Garson (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 610 , 614 ; Seasons Coal Co. v. Cleveland (1984), 10 Ohio St.3d 77 , 80 . {¶ 13} The parties each cite to Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland Inc. (1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 54 , for setting forth the essential elements of Patton's claim. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland
green
1 sentence2004Myers v. Garson (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 610 , 614 ; Seasons Coal Co. v. Cleveland (1984), 10 Ohio St.3d 77 , 80 . {¶ 13} The parties each cite to Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland Inc. (1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 54 , for setting forth the essential elements of Patton's claim. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Myers v. Garson
green
1 sentence2004Myers v. Garson (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 610 , 614 ; Seasons Coal Co. v. Cleveland (1984), 10 Ohio St.3d 77 , 80 . {¶ 13} The parties each cite to Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland Inc. (1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 54 , for setting forth the essential elements of Patton's claim. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.