Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Perry
green
2 sentences2006State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175 , para. four of the syllabus. 2004State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175 , paragraph nine of the syllabus. | 3 | 2004–2006 |
State v. Rexroad, Unpublished Decision (11-24-2004)
green
1 sentence2005No. 22214, 2004-Ohio-6271 , at ¶ 8 , citing State v. Clemens (May 31, 2000), 9th Dist. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Wayne Ernest Barker v. United States of America, United States of America v. Wayne Ernest Barker
green
1 sentence2004State v. Xie (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 521 , 526 , citing Barker v. United States (C.A.10, 1978), 579 F.2d 1219 , 1223 . {¶ 8} The doctrine of res judicata precludes any defense or any claimed lack of due process that was raised or could have been raised by the defendant at trial, or on an appeal from that judgment. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Xie
green
1 sentence2004State v. Xie (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 521 , 526 , citing Barker v. United States (C.A.10, 1978), 579 F.2d 1219 , 1223 . {¶ 8} The doctrine of res judicata precludes any defense or any claimed lack of due process that was raised or could have been raised by the defendant at trial, or on an appeal from that judgment. | 1 | 2004–2004 |